אָמַר רַב פָּפָּא: דִּיגָרוֹמֵי. Rav Pappa says: It is a balance scale for blacksmiths, who weigh heavy pieces of metal.
אָמַר רַבִּי מָנִי בַּר פַּטִּישׁ: כְּדֶרֶךְ שֶׁאָמְרוּ לְעִנְיַן אִיסּוּרָן, כָּךְ אָמְרוּ לְעִנְיַן טוּמְאָתָן. Rabbi Mani Bar Pattish says: Just as the Sages said with regard to the prohibition of the scales that one may not use a scale that does not meet the criteria listed in the baraita, so too they said that this applies with regard to their ritual impurity. In other words, if the cords and pole are not attached in the proper manner, they are not susceptible to ritual impurity as part of the scale.
מַאי קָא מַשְׁמַע לַן? תְּנֵינָא: חוּט מֹאזְנַיִם שֶׁל חֶנְוָנִי וְשֶׁל בַּעֲלֵי בָתִּים – טֶפַח! קָנֶה וּמִתְנָא שֶׁלָּהּ אִיצְטְרִיכָא לֵיהּ, דְּלָא תְּנַן. The Gemara asks: What is this statement teaching us? We learned in a mishna (Kelim 29:5): With regard to the rope from which the scales are suspended, if the balance scale belongs to a storekeeper or to homeowners it must be one handbreadth in length for it to be susceptible to ritual impurity. Why, then, is the statement of Rabbi Mani Bar Pattish necessary? The Gemara answers: Although the mishna in tractate Kelim discusses the rope from which the scales are suspended, it was still necessary for Rabbi Mani Bar Pattish to mention the halakha with regard to the scale’s lever and cord, which we did not learn about in that mishna.
תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: אֵין עוֹשִׂין מִשְׁקָלוֹת – לֹא שֶׁל בַּעַץ, וְלֹא שֶׁל אֲבָר, וְלֹא שֶׁל גִּיסְטְרוֹן, וְלֹא שֶׁל שְׁאָר מִינֵי מַתָּכוֹת. אֲבָל עוֹשֶׂה הוּא שֶׁל צוּנְמָא וְשֶׁל זְכוּכִית. § The Sages taught: One may not prepare weights of tin [ba’atz], nor of lead, nor of a metal alloy [gisteron], nor of any other types of metal, because all of these deteriorate over time and the buyer will ultimately pay for more merchandise than he receives. But one may prepare weights of hard rock and of glass.
תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: אֵין עוֹשִׂין הַמֶּחָק שֶׁל דְּלַעַת – מִפְּנֵי שֶׁהוּא קַל, וְלֹא שֶׁל מַתֶּכֶת – מִפְּנֵי שֶׁהוּא מַכְבִּיד. אֲבָל עוֹשֵׂהוּ שֶׁל זַיִת וְשֶׁל אֱגוֹז, שֶׁל שִׁקְמָה וְשֶׁל אֶשְׁבְּרוֹעַ. The Sages further taught: One may not prepare the leveler, used to remove the excess from the mouth of a vessel, from a gourd, because it is a light material and does not level effectively, thereby causing a loss for the seller. And it may not be made of metal, because it weighs down and removes too much of the merchandise, leading to a loss for the buyer. But one may prepare it from the wood of an olive tree, or of a nut tree, or of a sycamore tree, or of a boxwood tree, which are of medium weight.
תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: אֵין עוֹשִׂין אֶת הַמֶּחָק צִדּוֹ אֶחָד עָב וְצִדּוֹ אֶחָד קָצָר. לֹא יִמְחוֹק בְּבַת אַחַת, שֶׁהַמּוֹחֵק בְּבַת אַחַת – רַע לַמּוֹכֵר וְיָפֶה לַלּוֹקֵחַ; וְלֹא יִמְחוֹק מְעַט מְעַט – שֶׁרַע לַלּוֹקֵחַ וְיָפֶה לַמּוֹכֵר. The Sages taught: One may not prepare the leveler in such a manner that one of its sides is thick and one other side is thin, because in such a case the two sides will not level equally. Furthermore, one may not level all at once, by a single quick movement, as one who levels all at once acts in a manner that is bad for the seller and good for the buyer, because he removes less of the excess than one who levels in the regular fashion. And conversely one may not level little by little, i.e., with several slow movements, as this is bad for the buyer and good for the seller.
עַל כּוּלָּן אָמַר רַבָּן יוֹחָנָן בֶּן זַכַּאי: אוֹי לִי אִם אוֹמַר, אוֹי לִי אִם לֹא אוֹמַר; אִם אוֹמַר – שֶׁמָּא יִלְמְדוּ הָרַמָּאִין, וְאִם לֹא אוֹמַר – שֶׁמָּא יֹאמְרוּ הָרַמָּאִין: אֵין תַּלְמִידֵי חֲכָמִים בְּקִיאִין בְּמַעֲשֵׂה יָדֵינוּ. אִיבַּעְיָא לְהוּ: אַמְרַהּ, אוֹ לָא אַמְרַהּ? אֲמַר רַב שְׁמוּאֵל בַּר רַב יִצְחָק: אַמְרַהּ – וּמֵהַאי קְרָא אַמְרַהּ: ״כִּי יְשָׁרִים דַּרְכֵי ה׳, וְצַדִּקִים יֵלְכוּ בָם, וּפֹשְׁעִים יִכָּשְׁלוּ בָם״. Rabban Yoḥanan ben Zakkai said with regard to all these halakhot: Woe to me if I say them, and woe unto me if I do not say them. If I say them, perhaps swindlers will learn new methods of cheating of which they were previously unaware. And if I do not say them, perhaps swindlers will say: Torah scholars are not well versed in our handiwork. A dilemma was raised before the Sages: Did Rabban Yoḥanan ben Zakkai decide to say these halakhot in public or did he not say them? Rav Shmuel bar Rav Yitzḥak says: He said them, and he said them on the basis of this verse: “For the ways of the Lord are right, and the just walk in them; but transgressors stumble over them” (Hosea 14:10).
תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: ״לֹא תַעֲשׂוּ עָוֶל בַּמִּשְׁפָּט; בַּמִּדָּה, בַּמִּשְׁקָל וּבַמְּשׂוּרָה״; ״בַּמִּדָּה״ – זוֹ מְדִידַת קַרְקַע, שֶׁלֹּא יִמְדּוֹד לְאֶחָד בִּימוֹת הַחַמָּה וּלְאֶחָד בִּימוֹת הַגְּשָׁמִים. ״בַּמִּשְׁקָל״ – שֶׁלֹּא יַטְמִין מִשְׁקְלוֹתָיו בְּמֶלַח. ״בַּמְּשׂוּרָה״ – שֶׁלֹּא יַרְתִּיחַ. § The Gemara further discusses weights and measures. The Sages taught: “You shall do no unrighteousness in judgment, in measure [bammidda], in weight, or in measure [uvamesura]” (Leviticus 19:35). The baraita defines these terms: “In measure [bammidda],” this is referring to measuring land, teaching that in order to measure land in a just manner one may not measure for one person in the summer when the measuring rope has become dry and short, and for one other individual in the rainy season, when the measuring rope is wet and limp, and therefore stretches more. “In weight” means that one may not cover his weights in salt, as salt erodes the weights, causing a loss for the buyer. “Or in measure [bamesura]” means that one may not cause liquid he is measuring to foam by pouring it speedily, as this results in a loss for the buyer, who receives less of the liquid than the amount for which he paid.
וְקַל וָחוֹמֶר – וּמָה מְשׂוּרָה, שֶׁהִיא אֶחָד מִשְּׁלֹשִׁים וְשִׁשָּׁה בַּלּוֹג – הִקְפִּידָה עָלָיו תּוֹרָה; קַל וָחוֹמֶר לְהִין, וַחֲצִי הִין, וּשְׁלִישִׁית הַהִין, וּרְבִיעִית הַהִין; וְלוֹג, וַחֲצִי לוֹג, וּרְבִיעִית, וַחֲצִי תּוֹמֶן, וְעוּכְלָא. The Gemara notes: And it can be inferred by means of an a fortiori inference that if in the case of a mesura, which is a measure equivalent to merely one thirty-sixth of a log, the Torah was particular that one must measure honestly, so too, a fortiori, one must be careful in the case of one hin, and a half-hin, and a third-hin, and a quarter-hin, which is twelve log, and one log, and a half-log, and a quarter-log, and a half-tomen, i.e., one-sixteenth of a kav, and even an ukla, a smaller unit, as defined below.
אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה אָמַר רַב: אָסוּר לָאָדָם שֶׁיַּשְׁהֶה מִדָּה חֲסֵרָה אוֹ יְתֵרָה בְּתוֹךְ בֵּיתוֹ, וַאֲפִילּוּ הִיא עָבִיט שֶׁל מֵימֵי רַגְלַיִם. אָמַר רַב פָּפָּא: לָא אֲמַרַן אֶלָּא בְּאַתְרָא דְּלָא חֲתִימִי, אֲבָל בְּאַתְרָא דַּחֲתִימִי – אִי לָא חָזֵי חֲתִימָה לָא שָׁקֵיל. וּבְאַתְרָא דְּלָא חֲתִימִי נָמֵי לָא אֲמַרַן – אֶלָּא דְּלָא מְהַנְדְּסִי, אֲבָל מְהַנְדְּסִי – לֵית לַן בַּהּ. Rav Yehuda says that Rav says: It is prohibited for a person to keep in his house a measure that is too small or too large relative to its supposed volume or weight, and this is the case even if he does not measure with it but simply uses it as a chamber pot for urine. Rav Pappa said: We said this prohibition only with regard to a place where measures are not stamped with the government’s seal, which confirms that the measure is accurate. But in a place where the measures are stamped, if the buyer does not see the seal he would not take the merchandise. Since they could not be used dishonestly, one is permitted to utilize these measures for other purposes. And in a place where measures are not stamped as well, we said that it is prohibited to keep these measures in one’s house only in a place where they do not inspect measures to see if they are fit for use. But if they do inspect measures, we have no problem with it.
וְלָא הִיא; זִימְנִין דְּמִיקְּרֵי בֵּין הַשְּׁמָשׁוֹת, וּמִיקְּרֵי וְשָׁקֵיל. תַּנְיָא נָמֵי הָכִי: לֹא יַשְׁהֶה אָדָם מִדָּה חֲסֵרָה אוֹ יְתֵרָה בְּתוֹךְ בֵּיתוֹ, וַאֲפִילּוּ הִיא עָבִיט שֶׁל מֵימֵי רַגְלַיִם. אֲבָל עוֹשֶׂה הוּא סְאָה, תַּרְקַב, וַחֲצִי תַּרְקַב, וְקַב, וַחֲצִי קַב, וְרוֹבַע, וְתוֹמֶן, וַחֲצִי תּוֹמֶן, The Gemara comments: And that is not so; one is never permitted to keep incorrect measures in his house, as sometimes it happens that one measures at twilight, when people are hurried, and consequently it happens that the buyer takes the merchandise despite the fact that it was measured with an incorrect measure. This is also taught in a baraita: A person may not keep in his house a measure that is too small or too large, even if it is used as a chamber pot for urine. But he may prepare measures in accordance with the established format: Measurements of a se’a; a tarkav, which is three kav or one-half of a se’a; and a half-tarkav, which is one and one-half kav; and a kav; and a half-kav; and a quarter-kav; and a tomen, which is one-eighth of a kav; and a half-tomen;
וְעוּכְלָא. וְכַמָּה הִיא עוּכְלָא? אֶחָד מֵחֲמִשָּׁה בִּרְבִיעַ. וּבְמִדַּת הַלַּח הוּא עוֹשֶׂה הִין, וַחֲצִי הִין, וּשְׁלִישִׁית הַהִין, וּרְבִיעִית הַהִין, וְלוֹג, וַחֲצִי לוֹג, וּרְבִיעִית, וּשְׁמִינִית, וְאֶחָד מִשְּׁמוֹנָה בִּשְׁמִינִית – וְזֶהוּ קוּרְטוֹב. and an ukla. And how much is an ukla? It is one-fifth of a quarter of a kav. And in the case of liquid measures, one may prepare a hin, which is twelve log; and a half-hin, or six log; and a third-hin, or four log; and a quarter-hin, three log; and a log; and a half-log; and a quarter-log; and an eighth-log; and an eighth of an eighth-log, and this, the last mentioned, is a kortov.
וְלֶעְבֵּיד נָמֵי קַבַּיִים! אָתֵי לְאִיחַלּוֹפֵי בְּתַרְקַב. אַלְמָא טָעוּ אִינָשֵׁי תִּילְתָּא – אִי הָכִי, קַב נָמֵי לָא לֶיעְבֵּיד; דְּאָתֵי לְאִיחַלּוֹפֵי בַּחֲצִי תַּרְקַב! אֶלָּא קַבַּיִים הַיְינוּ טַעְמָא דְּלָא עָבֵיד – דְּאָתֵי לְאִיחַלּוֹפֵי בַּחֲצִי תַּרְקַב. The Gemara asks: And let one also prepare a measure equal to two kav. The Gemara answers that this measure is not used, lest people come to mistake it for a tarkav, which is three kav. The Gemara observes: Apparently, people err by one-third of a measure. If that is so, one should also not prepare a measure equal to a kav, as people may come to mistake it for a half-tarkav, which is equal to one and one-half kav. Rather, this is the reason that one may not prepare a two-kav measure: That people might come to mistake it for a half-tarkav, which is equal to one and one-half kav.
אַלְמָא טָעֵי אִינִישׁ רִיבְעָא – אִי הָכִי, חֲצִי תּוֹמֶן וְעוּכְלָא לָא לֶיעְבֵּיד! אָמַר רַב פָּפָּא: מִדּוֹת קְטַנּוֹת בְּקִיאִי בְּהוּ אִינָשֵׁי. The Gemara again suggests: Apparently, people err by one-quarter of a measure. If that is so, one should also not prepare measures of a half-tomen, which is one-sixteenth of a kav, and an ukla, which is one-twentieth of a kav. Since they differ by only one-fifth, there is a concern that people might mistake one measure for the other. Rav Pappa said: People are well-versed in small measures and can distinguish between them.
שְׁלִישִׁית הַהִין, רְבִיעִית הַהִין – לָא לֶיעְבֵּיד! כֵּיוָן דַּהֲווֹ בַּמִּקְדָּשׁ, לָא גְּזַרוּ בְּהוּ רַבָּנַן. בַּמִּקְדָּשׁ נָמֵי לִיגְזוֹר! כֹּהֲנִים זְרִיזִין הֵן. The Gemara continues: If people err by one-quarter of a measure, then since one may prepare a measure equal to four log, one-third of a hin, let one not prepare a measure equal to three log, one-quarter of a hin. The Gemara answers: Since these measures were used in the Temple, the Sages did not decree that they not be used. The Gemara asks: In the Temple as well, let the Sages decree that they should not be used, in case the two measures are mistaken for each other. The Gemara answers: The priests who serve in the Temple are vigilant and would not commit this error.
אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: אֵין מוֹסִיפִין עַל הַמִּדּוֹת יוֹתֵר מִשְּׁתוּת, וְלֹא עַל הַמַּטְבֵּעַ יָתֵר מִשְּׁתוּת, וְהַמִּשְׂתַּכֵּר אַל יִשְׁתַּכֵּר יוֹתֵר מִשְּׁתוּת. אֵין מוֹסִיפִין עַל הַמִּדּוֹת יוֹתֵר מִשְּׁתוּת – מַאי טַעְמָא? אִילֵּימָא מִשּׁוּם אַפְקוֹעֵי תַּרְעָא, שְׁתוּת נָמֵי לָא! § Shmuel says: If the residents of a certain place want to change the standard of their measures and augment them by a certain fraction, they may not increase the measures by more than one-sixth, and they may not increase the value of a coin by more than one-sixth of its previous value. And one who profits from his sales may not profit by more than one-sixth. The Gemara analyzes these statements. When Shmuel said: They may not increase the measures by more than one-sixth, what is the reason for this? If we say it is because doing so causes market prices to rise, the same concern should apply to raising the prices by one-sixth, and therefore this should also not be allowed.
אֶלָּא מִשּׁוּם אוֹנָאָה – דְּלָא לֶיהֱוֵי בִּיטּוּל מִקָּח? וְהָאָמַר רָבָא: כׇּל דָּבָר שֶׁבְּמִדָּה וְשֶׁבְּמִשְׁקָל וְשֶׁבְּמִנְיָן – אֲפִילּוּ פָּחוֹת מִכְּדֵי אוֹנָאָה חוֹזֵר! Rather, you will say that the prohibition is due to concern for exploitation; and they may increase the measures only by up to one-sixth, so that there will not be nullification of the transaction, as the transaction is nullified only when the disparity is more than one-sixth of the value of the item. The Gemara raises an objection: But doesn’t Rava say: With regard to any item that is otherwise subject to the halakhot of exploitation, and it is sold by measure, or by weight, or by number, even if the disparity was less than the measure of exploitation in the transaction, the transaction is reversed. A disparity of one-sixth between the value of an item and its price constitutes exploitation only in cases where there is room for error in assessing the value of an item. In a case where the details of the item are easily quantifiable, any deviation from the designated quantity results in a nullification of the transaction.
אֶלָּא דְּלָא לֶיהֱוֵי פְּסֵידָא לְתַגָּרָא. Rather, the prohibition is so that there will not be a loss suffered by the merchant, who might not realize that a new standard was issued, and sell in accordance with the old standard. Since a merchant usually enjoys a profit of one-sixth of the value of an item, if the standard is not increased by more than this amount he will not suffer a loss, as at worst he will forfeit his profit margin.
פְּסֵידָא הוּא דְּלָא לֶיהֱוֵי לֵיהּ – רַוְוחָא לָא בָּעֵי?! זְבַן וְזַבֵּין – תַּגָּרָא אִיקְּרִי?! This Gemara notes: This explanation is also difficult, since even if the aim is to ensure that there will not be a loss for the merchant, does he not need to earn a profit? There is a well-known adage in this regard: If you buy and sell without making any profit, will you be called a merchant? A merchant must profit from his sales; therefore, if this decree was instituted for the protection of merchants, the Sages should have ensured that they earn a profit.
אֶלָּא אָמַר רַב חִסְדָּא: שְׁמוּאֵל קְרָא אַשְׁכַּח וּדְרַשׁ – ״וְהַשֶּׁקֶל – עֶשְׂרִים גֵּרָה; עֶשְׂרִים שְׁקָלִים, חֲמִשָּׁה וְעֶשְׂרִים שְׁקָלִים, עֲשָׂרָה וַחֲמִשָּׁה שֶׁקֶל – הַמָּנֶה יִהְיֶה לָכֶם״. Rather, Rav Ḥisda said: The prohibition is not based on logical reasoning. Instead, Shmuel found a verse and interpreted it homiletically: “And the shekel shall be twenty gera; twenty shekels, five and twenty shekels, ten, and five shekels, shall be your maneh” (Ezekiel 45:12). According to this verse, the combination of all of these numbers, sixty shekels, is equivalent to a maneh.