What responsibility do we have to address issues of food waste?
This source sheet is a dive into our tradition's commentary on prohibitions against wanton waste, environmental stewardship, responsibility for community members in need, and responses to hunger and surplus. We hope that it serves to mobilize Jewish communities to act on climate change and food injustice by reducing food waste, keeping it out of landfills, and transforming it to reduce food insecurity.
Original source sheet by Lior Gross.
Bal Tashchit
(יט) כִּֽי־תָצ֣וּר אֶל־עִיר֩ יָמִ֨ים רַבִּ֜ים לְֽהִלָּחֵ֧ם עָלֶ֣יהָ לְתָפְשָׂ֗הּ לֹֽא־תַשְׁחִ֤ית אֶת־עֵצָהּ֙ לִנְדֹּ֤חַ עָלָיו֙ גַּרְזֶ֔ן כִּ֚י מִמֶּ֣נּוּ תֹאכֵ֔ל וְאֹת֖וֹ לֹ֣א תִכְרֹ֑ת כִּ֤י הָֽאָדָם֙ עֵ֣ץ הַשָּׂדֶ֔ה לָבֹ֥א מִפָּנֶ֖יךָ בַּמָּצֽוֹר׃
(19) When in your war against a city you have to besiege it a long time in order to capture it, you must not destroy its trees, wielding the ax against them. You may eat of them, but you must not cut them down. For are trees of the field human, to withdraw before you into the besieged city?
Bal Taschit refers to the prohibition against destruction of fruit trees when besieging a city. This is the initial prohibition against wanton destruction.
(י) וְלֹא הָאִילָנוֹת בִּלְבַד. אֶלָּא כָּל הַמְשַׁבֵּר כֵּלִים. וְקוֹרֵעַ בְּגָדִים. וְהוֹרֵס בִּנְיָן. וְסוֹתֵם מַעְיָן. וּמְאַבֵּד מַאֲכָלוֹת דֶּרֶךְ הַשְׁחָתָה. עוֹבֵר בְּלֹא תַשְׁחִית. וְאֵינוֹ לוֹקֶה אֶלָּא מַכַּת מַרְדּוּת מִדִּבְרֵיהֶם:
(10) And not only regarding trees, but even one who destructively breaks vessels or rips up clothing or tears down a building or seals up a spring or wastes food violates the Negative Commandment of “Do not destroy”. However, he only receives stripes for disobedience, in accordance with the Rabbis.
The Mishneh Torah expands the scope of Bal Tashchit to address issues of food, water, resource, and energy waste.
Questions for discussion:
What is the relationship between the items that the Mishneh Torah prohibits for destruction? What do they have in common?
(י) כי האדם עץ השדה. שחייו של אדם (אינו אלא) מן האילן.
(10) '...For a person is a tree of the field' teaches that the life of a person comes (only) from the tree.
The Sifrei is commenting on the interesting last phrase of our original source, and translates the words slightly differently (using “כי” as a statement instead of a question); instead of "for are trees of the field human," the Sifrei reveals another shade of meaning, "for a person is a tree of the field."
Questions for discussion:
What ideas are the Sifrei bringing to our attention with this commentary?
In what ways does our current food system (and popular food ethics) disconnect our lives from other-than-human lives (eg. plants, animals)?
Do you agree with R' Yishmael's 'logical inference' above?
Does a tree have intrinsic value or simply the virtue of producing fruit?
(ב) שרש המצוה ידוע, שהוא כדי ללמד נפשנו לאהב הטוב והתועלת ולהדבק בו, ומתוך כך תדבק בנו הטובה, ונרחיק מכל דבר רע ומכל דבר השחתה, וזהו דרך החסידים ואנשי מעשה אוהבים שלום ושמחים בטוב הבריות ומקרבים אותן לתורה, ולא יאבדו אפילו גרגיר של חרדל בעולם, ויצר עליהם בכל אבדון והשחתה שיראו, ואם יוכלו להציל יצילו כל דבר מהשחית בכל כחם. ולא כן הרשעים אחיהם של מזיקים שמחים בהשחתת עולם, והמה משחיתים את עצמם במדה שאדם מודד בה מודדין לו. כלומר, בה הוא נדבק לעולם, וכענין שכתוב (משלי יז, ה) שמח לאיד לא ינקה רע. והחפץ בטוב ושמח בו נפשו בטוב תלין לעולם זה ידוע ומפרסם.
(2) The root of this commandment is well-known - it is in order to teach our souls to love good and benefit and to cling to it. And through this, good clings to us and we will distance [ourselves] from all bad and destructive things. And this is the way of the pious and people of [proper] action - they love peace and are happy for the good of the creatures and bring them close to Torah, and they do not destroy even a grain of mustard in the world. And they are distressed by all loss and destruction that they see; and if they can prevent it, they will prevent any destruction with all of their strength. But not so are the wicked - the brothers of the destructive spirits. They rejoice in the destruction of the world, and they destroy themselves - [since] in the way that a person measures, so is he measured; which is to say that he clings to it forever, as the matter that is written (Proverbs 17:5), "the one who rejoices in calamity, will not be cleared (of evil)." And the one who desires the good and rejoices in it, 'his soul will dwell in the good' forever. This is known and famous.
Questions for discussion:
What is the tone of the Sefer HaChinukh in this source? Is it an appeal to logic, ethic, or emotion?
Are there times when you might be able to use more of your strength to prevent destruction, and in particular to prevent the waste of food? What keeps you from doing so?
Stewardship
A brief introduction to problems in the food system: Linear thinking and externalities.
The systems that create food waste also create vast environmental damage. Much of the food grown or consumed in this country is produced at a surplus, valuing quantity over the demands of the market. According to Earl Butz’s policies from the 1970s, (about) 40% of the food produced in the US is being thrown out at some point along the way, including from farms, stores, restaurants, and homes. This is an outcome of our short-term, linear thinking and industrial “efficiency.” We ask, “What is the fastest and cheapest way to get food from the ground to my plate” without asking, “Who and what is impacted by this process?” We value industrial efficiency and short-term savings and profit over fairness and long-term sustainability. Linear modes of thinking cause inputs to be taken for granted, so unnecessarily large amounts of water, fossil fuel, fertilizer, herbicide, pesticide, and land are used to produce our food.
Even though food production is high, there are impacts that are ignored by corporations and unseen by consumers. Externalities are side effects or consequences of an activity that affects other parties without this being reflected in the cost of the goods or services involved. Examples of that in food production are dangerous seasonal jobs which exploit migrant laborers, and pollution, like the huge dead zones in the Gulf of Mexico which are devoid of oxygen due to fertilizer that washes down the Mississippi. This is industrially efficient only because the externalities go unaccounted for. The result is “cheap” means of production and food, but also degradation of our farmlands, the lives of farm laborers, and our environment at large. The costs of the externalities are passed on to us in the form of farm subsidies from our tax dollars, cancer for farm workers, vanishing freshwater aquifers, and massive greenhouse gas emissions. If corporations had to pay for the effects of these things, the food wouldn’t be quite so “cheap.”
Linear thinking and its excessive, inefficient inputs and externalities are “wanton destruction” and in violation of bal taschit. Sustainable agriculture, on the other hand, reflects circular rather than linear thinking, and practices that don’t discount externalities and rather are regenerative. This means that inputs aren’t taken for granted and are used in ways that are genuinely efficient, and there are no hidden/externalized costs. A system like this automatically leads to less waste in every step of the process.
The Story of Stuff is a mini-documentary that opens viewers’ eyes to the underside of our production and consumption patterns, explains linear thinking and externalities, and makes the connection between our shopping habits and a number of environmental and social issues.
Do we, as Jews, have a responsibility to take care of the planet?
Horeb, sections 397, 398 (R. Shimshon Rephael Hirsch, 1808-1888)
If you should regard the beings beneath you as objects without rights, not perceiving G‑d who created them, and therefore desire that they feel the might of your presumptuous mood, instead of using them only as the means of wise human activity—then G-d’s call proclaims to you, “Do not destroy anything!” Be a mensch! Only if you use the things around you for wise human purposes, sanctified by the word of My teaching, only then are you a mensch and have the right over them which I have given you as a human. However, if you destroy, if you ruin, at that moment you are not a human and have no right to the things around you. I lent them to you for wise use only; never forget that I lent them to you. As soon as you use them unwisely, be it the greatest or the smallest, you commit treachery against My world, you commit murder and robbery against My property, you sin against Me! In truth, there is no one nearer to idolatry than one who can disregard the fact that all things are the creatures and property of G-d, and who then presumes to have the right, because he has the might, to destroy them according to a presumptuous act of will. Yes, that one is already serving the most powerful idols—anger, pride, and above all ego, which in its passion regards itself as the master of things.
Questions for discussion:
What constitutes a "wise purpose"?
What is the relationship between people, resources, and G-d?
יומא חד הוה אזל באורחא חזייה לההוא גברא דהוה נטע חרובא אמר ליה האי עד כמה שנין טעין אמר ליה עד שבעין שנין אמר ליה פשיטא לך דחיית שבעין שנין אמר ליה האי [גברא] עלמא בחרובא אשכחתיה כי היכי דשתלי לי אבהתי שתלי נמי לבראי
One day, he was walking along the road when he saw a certain man planting a carob tree. Ḥoni said to him: This tree, after how many years will it bear fruit? The man said to him: It will not produce fruit until seventy years have passed. Ḥoni said to him: Is it obvious to you that you will live seventy years, that you expect to benefit from this tree? He said to him: That man himself found a world full of carob trees. Just as my ancestors planted for me, I too am planting for my descendants.
Questions for discussion:
How can combating food waste be like planting a carob tree, creating a better world for our descendants?
Pe'ah & Psolet- Rethinking "waste"
Questions for discussion:
What are we commanded regarding the "extra" gleanings of the harvest and fallen fruit of the vineyard?
What might this commandment require of us, if we do not have a vineyard or field? Where does our "extra" come from?
(יג) חַ֧ג הַסֻּכֹּ֛ת תַּעֲשֶׂ֥ה לְךָ֖ שִׁבְעַ֣ת יָמִ֑ים בְּאָ֨סְפְּךָ֔ מִֽגָּרְנְךָ֖ וּמִיִּקְבֶֽךָ׃
(13) After the ingathering from your threshing floor and your vat, you shall hold the Feast of Booths for seven days.
(א) דָּ"אַ — באספך מגרנך ומיקבך, לִמֵּד שֶׁמְּסַכְּכִין אֶת הַסֻּכָּה בִּפְסֹלֶת גֹּרֶן וְיֶקֶב (ראש השנה י"ג; סוכה י"ב):
(1) Another explanation is: "after the ingathering from your threshing floor and your vat" teaches that one should cover the Succah only with the פסולת (psolet, lit., the chips, — the "leftovers") of the barn and the wine-press [i.e. with vegetable matter] (Rosh Hashanah 13a; Sukkah 12a).
Rashi is connecting the two parts of the verse. Sukkot and gathering are related: The "psolet/leftovers" from your harvest should be used to create your Sukkah.
Questions for discussion:
If you were to cover your Sukkah with something other than psolet material, what would you use? What resources would be consumed? What does the Torah teach us by telling us to use psolet?
Feeding the Hungry
We are faced with a discrepancy: we have food overproduction and waste, but also food insecurity. This points to a food distribution problem, not a lack of food. We know that about 1 in 8 people in the US are food insecure, meaning they do not have consistent or reliable ways to access food that fulfills all of their nutritional needs or those of their families. Food insecurity is an externality that can compound with the effects of the treatment of farm and food industry workers. Asthma disproportionately affects underserved communities located near industrial centers. “Environmental racism” refers to the policies that are responsible for removing community assets (like grocery stores) while introducing pollution.
In what ways, as Jews, are we obligated to help the poor, underserved, and hungry members of our communities and those who live amongst us?
(7) If, however, there is a needy person among you, one of your kinsmen in any of your settlements in the land that the LORD your God is giving you, do not harden your heart and shut your hand against your needy kinsman. (8) Rather, you must open your hand and lend him sufficient for whatever he needs.
(ז) ...אָמַר רַבִּי חַגַּי בְּשֵׁם רַבִּי יִצְחָק כְּתִיב (קהלת ה, יג): וְאָבַד הָעשֶׁר הַהוּא בְּעִנְיַן רָע. שֶׁהֵשִׁיב לְאוֹתוֹ הֶעָנִי בְּעִנְיַן רָע וְאָמַר לוֹ לֵית אַתְּ אָזֵיל לָעֵי וְנָגֵיס, חָמֵי שָׁקְיָין, חָמֵי כְּרָעִין, חָמֵי כָּרְסָוָן, חָמֵי קֻפְרָן. אָמַר לוֹ הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא לֹא דַיָּךְ שֶׁלֹּא נָתַתָּ לוֹ מִשֶּׁלָּךְ מְאוּמָה אֶלָּא בַּמֶּה שֶׁנָּתַתִּי לוֹ אַתְּ מֵשִׂים בּוֹ עַיִן רָעָה.
(7) 7. ...R. Haggai said in the name of R. Yitzhak: It is written, "And those riches perish by evil ways" (Ecclesiastes 5:13). That he [the rich one being asked for money] answered the poor man in an evil way, saying to him: "You do not go to work and [therefore have no food to] eat? See what forelegs! See what legs! See that stomach! See that flesh!" The Holy One, blessed be He [then] says to him: "Not only have you not given him anything that belongs to you, but what I did give him you looked at with an evil eye."
While a common response to food insecurity is to point out health problems such as obesity and heart disease that plague underserved communities, this is another symptom of malnutrition in a system that precludes access to healthier foods.
Problems like lack of a livable wage, rising housing costs, and food geography (sources of healthy food are not always available in lower-income areas) are systematic problems which limit the choices people can make about their food. If people have to work longer hours to continue living in their home, they will not have time or money to get healthy food for their families.
Questions for discussion:
What does the verse in Ecclesiastes teach about the consequences of this response to a request for charity?
Gratitude
אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: כׇּל הַנֶּהֱנֶה מִן הָעוֹלָם הַזֶּה בְּלֹא בְּרָכָה כְּאִילּוּ נֶהֱנָה מִקׇּדְשֵׁי שָׁמַיִם, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״לַה׳ הָאָרֶץ וּמְלוֹאָהּ״. רַבִּי לֵוִי רָמֵי: כְּתִיב ״לַה׳ הָאָרֶץ וּמְלוֹאָהּ״, וּכְתִיב ״הַשָּׁמַיִם שָׁמַיִם לַה׳ וְהָאָרֶץ נָתַן לִבְנֵי אָדָם״! לָא קַשְׁיָא כָּאן קוֹדֶם בְּרָכָה, כָּאן לְאַחַר בְּרָכָה.
Similarly, Rav Yehuda said that Shmuel said: One who derives benefit from this world without a blessing, it is as if he enjoyed objects consecrated to the heavens (which are forbidden to be used), as it is stated: “The earth and all it contains is the Lord’s, the world and all those who live in it” (Psalms 24:1). Rabbi Levi expressed this concept differently. Rabbi Levi raised a contradiction: It is written: “The earth and all it contains is the Lord’s,” and it is written elsewhere: “The heavens are the Lord’s and the earth He has given over to mankind” (Psalms 115:16). There is clearly a contradiction with regard to whom the earth belongs. He himself resolves the contradiction: This is not difficult. Here, the verse that says that the earth is the Lord’s refers to the situation before a blessing is recited, and here, where it says that He gave the earth to mankind refers to after a blessing is recited.
In order to combat food waste at a personal level (in addition to actions that change the larger systemic issues we've discussed) we must engender an ethic of gratitude around our food. By appreciating the food that we have, we can appreciate the importance of food for others.
Questions for discussion:
Making a blessing before eating somehow moves the food from being G-d's to being ours. How does this work? What does it teach us about what our relationship with food should be? (See R' Shimshon Rephael Hirsch above)?
How do blessings on food cultivate gratitude?
וכל פניא דמעלי שבתא הוה משדר שלוחא לשוקא וכל ירקא דהוה פייש להו לגינאי זבין ליה ושדי ליה לנהרא וליתביה לעניים זמנין דסמכא דעתייהו ולא אתו למיזבן ולשדייה לבהמה קסבר מאכל אדם אין מאכילין לבהמה ולא ליזבניה כלל נמצאת מכשילן לעתיד לבא
Rafram bar Pappa further relates: And every Shabbat eve, in the afternoon, Rav Huna would send a messenger to the marketplace, and he would purchase all the vegetables that were left with the gardeners who sold their crops, and throw them into the river. The Gemara asks: But why did he throw out the vegetables? Let him give them to the poor. The Gemara answers: If he did this, the poor would sometimes rely on the fact that Rav Huna would hand out vegetables, and they would not come to purchase any. This would ruin the gardeners’ livelihood. The Gemara further asks: And let him throw them to the animals. The Gemara answers: He holds that human food may not be fed to animals, as this is a display of contempt for the food. The Gemara objects: But if Rav Huna could not use them in any way, he should not purchase the vegetables at all. The Gemara answers: If nothing is done, you would have been found to have caused a stumbling block for them in the future. If the vegetable sellers see that some of their produce is left unsold, the next week they will not bring enough for Shabbat. Therefore, Rav Huna made sure that the vegetables were all bought, so that the sellers would continue to bring them.
Questions for discussion:
There is a lot going on in this story!
What are the various concerns that should be taken into account? What are R' Huna's concerns? What are the rabbis' concerns?
How do we interpret this text in a context of systemic overproduction? How do food surpluses and systemic overproduction impact our sense of gratitude?
Can you think of some other solutions?