(12) And he said, “O YHVH, God of my master Abraham, grant me good fortune this day, and deal graciously with my master Abraham: (13) Here I stand by the spring as the daughters of the townsmen come out to draw water; (14) let the maiden to whom I say, ‘Please, lower your jar that I may drink,’ and who replies, ‘Drink, and I will also water your camels’—let her be the one whom You have decreed for Your servant Isaac. Thereby shall I know that You have dealt graciously with my master.”
THE ONE WHOM YOU HAVE DECREED — She is fit for him since she will be charitable and will therefore be worthy of admission into the house of Abraham.
What do you think that Eliezer meant by the phrase, "the one whom You have decreed"? Does your answer agree more with Rashi or Rashbam. How does this answer (if at all) influence how you think about your role with couples you work with?
(א) ויאמר אלקים נעשה אדם בצלמנו כדמותנו. אמר רבי ירמיה בן אלעזר: בשעה שברא הקדוש ברוך הוא את אדם הראשון, אנדרוגינוס בראו, הדא הוא דכתיב: זכר ונקבה בראם. אמר רבי שמואל בר נחמן: בשעה שברא הקב"ה את אדם הראשון, דיו פרצופים בראו ונסרו ועשאו גביים, גב לכאן וגב לכאן. איתיבון ליה, והכתיב: ויקח אחת מצלעותיו?! אמר להון: מתרין סטרוהי.
(1) Rabbi Yirmiyah son of Elazar said, when G!d created the first earthling, it was created an androgninus [intersex]; thus is it written, "male and female did G!d create them."
Rabbi Shmuel son of Nachman said, when G!d created the first earthling, G!d created him with two faces, one on each side, and G!d [later] split him along the middle, forming two backs. They [other rabbis] challenged him: saying but is it not written, "And G!d took one of his ribs!" Shmuel replied saying"mitzalotav" doesn't mean rib, but rather one of its sides.
What do these two narratives say about the nature of partnership? What are the differences between R. Yirmiyah ben Elazar's story from R. Shmuel bar Nachman? Are either of these resonant for you in your experience of being in or supporting partnerships?
(ד) רַבִּי יְהוּדָה בַּר סִימוֹן פָּתַח (תהלים סח, ז): אֱלֹקִים מוֹשִׁיב יְחִידִים בַּיְתָה, מַטְרוֹנָה שָׁאֲלָה אֶת רַבִּי יוֹסֵי בַּר חֲלַפְתָּא אָמְרָה לוֹ לְכַמָּה יָמִים בָּרָא הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא אֶת עוֹלָמוֹ, אָמַר לָהּ לְשֵׁשֶׁת יָמִים, כְּדִכְתִיב (שמות כ, יא): כִּי שֵׁשֶׁת יָמִים עָשָׂה יקוק אֶת הַשָּׁמַיִם וְאֶת הָאָרֶץ. אָמְרָה לוֹ מַה הוּא עוֹשֶׂה מֵאוֹתָהּ שָׁעָה וְעַד עַכְשָׁו, אָמַר לָהּ, הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא יוֹשֵׁב וּמְזַוֵּג זִוּוּגִים, בִּתּוֹ שֶׁל פְּלוֹנִי לִפְלוֹנִי, אִשְׁתּוֹ שֶׁל פְּלוֹנִי לִפְלוֹנִי, מָמוֹנוֹ שֶׁל פְּלוֹנִי לִפְלוֹנִי. אָמְרָה לֵיהּ, וְדָא הוּא אֻמָּנוּתֵיהּ, אַף אֲנִי יְכוֹלָה לַעֲשׂוֹת כֵּן, כַּמָּה עֲבָדִים כַּמָּה שְׁפָחוֹת יֵשׁ לִי, לְשָׁעָה קַלָּה אֲנִי יְכוֹלָה לְזַוְּגָן. אָמַר לָהּ, אִם קַלָּה הִיא בְּעֵינַיִךְ, קָשָׁה הִיא לִפְנֵי הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא כִּקְרִיעַת יַם סוּף. הָלַךְ לוֹ רַבִּי יוֹסֵי בַּר חֲלַפְתָּא, מֶה עָשְׂתָה נָטְלָה אֶלֶף עֲבָדִים וְאֶלֶף שְׁפָחוֹת וְהֶעֱמִידָה אוֹתָן שׁוּרוֹת שׁוּרוֹת, אָמְרָה פְּלַן יִסַּב לִפְלוֹנִית וּפְלוֹנִית תִּסַּב לִפְלוֹנִי, וְזִוְּגָה אוֹתָן בְּלַיְלָה אַחַת. לְמָחָר אֲתוֹן לְגַבָּהּ דֵּין מוֹחֵיהּ פְּצִיעָא, דֵּין עֵינוֹ שְׁמִיטָא, דֵּין רַגְלֵיהּ תְּבִירָא. אָמְרָה לְהוֹן מַה לְּכוֹן, דָּא אֲמָרָה לֵית אֲנָא בָּעֵי לְדֵין, וְדֵין אֲמַר לֵית אֲנָא בָּעֵי לְדָא. מִיָּד שָׁלְחָה וְהֵבִיאָה אֶת רַבִּי יוֹסֵי בַּר חֲלַפְתָּא, אָמְרָה לוֹ לֵית אֱלוֹקַּ כֶּאֱלָהֲכוֹן, אֱמֶת הִיא תּוֹרַתְכוֹן נָאָה וּמְשֻׁבַּחַת יָפֶה אָמַרְתָּ. אָמַר לֹא כָךְ אָמַרְתִּי לָךְ, אִם קַלָּה הִיא בְּעֵינַיִךְ קָשָׁה הִיא לִפְנֵי הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא כִּקְרִיעַת יַם סוּף, הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא מָה עוֹשֶׂה לָהֶן מְזַוְּגָן בְּעַל כָּרְחָן שֶׁלֹא בְּטוֹבָתָן.
A Roman Matron asked Rabbi Yosi ben Halafta, "In how many days did God create the world?" He said, "In six, as it is said, 'Since six days God made...' (Exodus 20:11) "And since then," she asked, "what has God been doing?" "God sits [on the Heavenly Throne] and makes matches: the daughter of this one to that one, the wife [i.e. widow] of this one to that one, the money of this one to that one," responded R. Yosi. "And for merely this you believe in G!d!" she said. "Even I can do that. I have many slaves, both male and female. In no time at all, I can match them for marriage." R. Yosi, "Though this may be an easy thing for you to do, for God it is as difficult as splitting the Sea of Reeds." Whereupon, Rabbi Yosi took his leave. What did she do? The Matron lined up a thousand male and a thousand female slaves and said you marry you, and married them all off that night. The next day, one slave had his head bashed in, another had lost an eye, while a third hobbled because of a broken leg. She said to them: "What happened to you?" and they each said to her: "I don't want this one" [with whom you matched me]." Immediately, she sent for and summoned R. Yosi and she said: "There is no God like your God, and your Torah is true, pleasing and praiseworthy. You spoke wisely."
He said to her, "Didn't I tell you, if it appears easy in your eyes, it is difficult for the Holy One Blessed Be He like splitting the sea." "What do you think? That The Holy Blessed One, is marrying them against their will but not for their benefit?!?"
What does this source bring up for you? Does matchmaking seem like a thing humans can/should do? Do you think people marry folks not for their benefit?
(ב) תָּא חֲזֵי, כָּל רוּחִין דְּעָלְמָא כְּלִילָן דְּכַר וְנוּקְבָּא, וְכַד נָפְקִין, דְּכַר וְנוּקְבָּא נָפְקִין, וּלְבָתַר מִתְפָּרְשָׁן בְּאָרְחַיְיהוּ, אִי זָכֵי בַּר נָשׁ, לְבָתַר מִזְדַּוְּוגֵי כַּחֲדָא. וְהַיְינוּ בַּת זוּגוֹ, וּמִתְחַבְּרָן בְּזִוּוּגָא (ס''א בגוונא) חַד בְּכֹלָּא, רוּחָא וְגוּפָא.
Come and see. All souls that are in the world include both male and female. And when the souls issue forth, they emerge as male and female, and after [they have descended to the physical world] each separates and goes its own way.
If a person merits they join together [again] as one unit. That partner is their true soulmate. They join together as one unit in everything, in spirit and in body.
What does this Zohar add to the earlier texts? What do you think are the primary sources that influenced/resonate with it?
------------------------- Up to here in Chevruta --------------
ולא יעלה ח"ו על הדעת לומר שזמרי היה נואף ח"ו כי מן הנואף לא עשה הקב"ה פרשה בתורה, אך יש סוד בדבר זה, דהנה יש יו"ד נקודות בזנות, אך יש סוד בדבר זה...
וכענין יהודא ותמר, ואיהי בת זוגו ממש וזה הענין היה גם כאן, כי זמרי היה באמת שומר עצמו מכל התאוות הרעות, ועתה עלתה בדעתו שהיא בת זוגו מאחר שאין בכוחו לסלק א"ע מזה המעשה ופנחס אמר להיפך שעדיין יש בכוחו לסלק עצמו מזה
It would not, God forbid, occur to anyone to say that Zimri was licentious, for the Holy Blessed One, would never have dedicated an entire Parsha in the holy Torah to licentionsness. Rather, there is a secret in this whole affair...
Such was the case with Yehuda and Tamar, for she was his true soulmate. This is also the case here [in the case of Zimri and Kozbi], for Zimri was on the very highest level of guarding himself from giving in to his evil desires. Since it was impossible for him to remove himself from the action, he concluded that she was his true soulmate. Pinchas believed that the opposite was true, that Zimri still had the power of free choice and could have refrained from the sin
א"ר שמואל בר רב יצחק כי הוה פתח ריש לקיש בסוטה אמר הכי אין מזווגין לו לאדם אשה אלא לפי מעשיו שנא' (תהלים קכה, ג) כי לא ינוח שבט הרשע על גורל הצדיקים אמר רבה בר בר חנה אמר ר' יוחנן וקשין לזווגן כקריעת ים סוף, שנאמר (תהלים סח, ז) אלקים מושיב יחידים ביתה מוציא אסירים בכושרות איני והא אמר רב יהודה אמר רב ארבעים יום קודם יצירת הולד בת קול יוצאת ואומרת בת פלוני לפלוני בית פלוני לפלוני שדה פלוני לפלוני לא קשיא הא בזוג ראשון הא בזוג שני
Rav Shmuel bar Rav Yitzḥak says...Heaven matches a woman to a man only according to his actions, as it is stated: “For the rod of wickedness shall not rest upon the lot of the righteous” (Psalms 125:3). Rabba bar bar Ḥana says that Rabbi Yoḥanan says: And it is as difficult to match a couple together as was the splitting of the Red Sea...
Is that so that partner are matched according to one's actions? But Rav Yehuda says that Rav says: Forty days before an embryo is formed a Divine Voice issues forth and says: The daughter of so-and-so is destined to marry so-and-so; such and such a house is destined to be inhabited by so-and-so; such and such a field is destined to be farmed by so-and-so.
This distinction of views is not difficult. This statement that Rav Yehuda says in the name of Rav [predestined marriage from 40 days] is with regard to a first match [zivug], while this statement of Rabba bar bar Ḥana [difficulty making zivugim] in the name of Rabbi Yoḥanan is with regard to a second match.
(ו) וְתָּא חֲזֵי, בְּכָל אִנּוּן דִּיוּקְנִין דְּנִשְׁמָתִין דְּעָלְמָא כֻּלְהוּ זִוּוּגִין זִוּוּגִין קַמֵּיהּ. לְבָתַר כַּד אַתְיָין לְהַאי עָלְמָא קוּדְשָׁא בְּרִיךְ הוּא מְזַוִּוג זִוּוּגִין.
(ז) אָמַר רַבִּי (יהודה) יִצְחָק קוּדְשָׁא בְּרִיךְ הוּא (מזווג זווגין ואמר) אָמַר בַּת פְּלוֹנִי לִפְלוֹנִי. אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹסֵי מַאי קָא מַיְירֵי וְהָא כְּתִיב, (קהלת א) אֵין כָּל חָדָשׁ תַּחַת הַשֶּׁמֶשׁ. אָמַר רַבִּי יְהוּדָה תַּחַת הַשֶּׁמֶשׁ כְּתִיב, שָׁאנֵי לְעֵילָא.
(ח) אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹסֵי מַאי כָּרוֹזָא הָכָא. וְהָא אָמַר רַבִּי חִזְקִיָּה אָמַר רַבִּי חִיָּיא בְּהַהִיא שַׁעֲתָא מַמָּשׁ דְּנָפִיק בַּר נָשׁ לְעָלְמָא בַּת זוּגוֹ אִזְדַמְּנַת לוֹ. אָמַר רַבִּי אַבָּא זַכָּאִין אִנּוּן צַדִּיקַיָּיא דְּנִשְׁמַתְהוֹן מִתְעַטְּרִין קַמֵּי מַלְכָּא קַדִּישָׁא עַד לָא יֵיתוּן לְעָלְמָא, דְּהָכִי תָּנִינָן בְּהַהִיא שַׁעֲתָא דְּאַפִּיק קוּדְשָׁא בְּרִיךְ הוּא נִשְׁמָתִין לְעָלְמָא, כָּל אִנּוּן רוּחִין וְנִשְׁמָתִין כֻּלְהוּ כְּלִילָן דְּכַר וְנוּקְבָא דְּמִתְחַבְּרָן כְּחֲדָא.
(ט) וְאִתְמַסְּרָן בִּידָא דְּהַהוּא מְמַנָּא שְׁלִיחָא דְּאִתְפַּקַּד עַל עִדּוּאֵיהוֹן דִּבְנֵי נָשָׁא. וְלַיְלָה שְׁמֵיהּ, וּבְשַׁעֲתָא דְּנָחֲתִין וְאִתְמַסְרָן בִּידוֹי מִתְפָּרְשִׁין, וּלְזִמְנִין דָּא אַקְדִּים מִן דָּא וְאָחִית לְהוּ בִּבְנֵי נָשָׁא. וְכַד (מחא) מָטָא עִידָן דְּזִוּוּגָא דִלְהוֹן. קוּדְשָׁא בְּרִיךְ הוּא דְּיָדַע אִנּוּן רוּחִין וְנִשְׁמָתִין מְחַבַּר לוֹן כִּדְבְּקַדְמִיתָא וּמַכְרְזָא עֲלַיְיהוּ. וְכַד אִתְחַבְּרָן אִתְעֲבִידוּ חַד גּוּפָא חַד נִשְׁמָתָא יָמִינָא וּשְׂמָאלָא כְּדְקָא חָזֵי, וּבְגִין כָּךְ אֵין כָּל חָדָשׁ תַּחַת הַשָּׁמֶשׁ. וְאִי תֵימָא הָא תָּנִינָן לֵית זִוּוּגָא אֶלָּא לְפוּם עוֹבָדוֹי וְאָרְחוֹי דְּבַר נָשׁ. הָכִי הוּא וַדַּאי. דְּאִי זָכֵי וְעוֹבָדוֹי אִתְכַּשְׁרָן, זָכֵי לְהַהוּא דִּילֵיהּ לְאִתְחַבָּרָא בֵּיהּ כְּמָה דְּנָפִיק....
תָּאנָא בְּרָזָא דְּמַתְנִיתָּא כָּל אִנּוּן דְּאָתוּ בְּגִלְגּוּלָא דְּנִשְׁמָתִין יָכְלִין לְאַקְדָּמָא בְּרַחֲמֵי זִוּוּגָא דִּלְהוֹן. וְעַל הַאי אִתְעָרוּ חַבְרַיָיא. (אין נושאין נשים במועד אבל מקדשין) שֶׁמָּא יְקַדְּמֶנּוּ אַחֵר בְּרַחֲמִים.
“Come and see: All those images of souls destined for the world stand before [God] in couples. Later, when they arrive in this world, the blessed Holy One matches couples.
Rabbi Yehudah said, ‘The blessed Holy One matches couples, proclaiming: The daughter of so-and-so for so-so!’
Rabbi Yose said, ‘How can you make such an assertion? Look at what is written: There is nothing new under the sun (Ecclesiastes 1:9)!’
Rabbi Yehudah replied, ‘The verse reads: under the sun. It is different above!’
Rabbi Yose said, ‘Why a proclamation here? Didn’t Rabbi Ḥizkiyah say in the name of Rabbi Ḥiyya: ‘At the very moment a human being issues into the world, his mate is destined for him’?
Rabbi Abba said, ‘Happy are the righteous whose souls are hidden away with the Holy King before they come into the world! For so we have learned: At the moment the blessed Holy One brings forth souls into the world, all those spirits and souls comprise male and female joined as one. They are transmitted into the hands of the emissary appointed over human conception. As they descend and are entrusted to G!d, they separate—sometimes one preceding the other—and G!d deposits them in human beings. When the time of their coupling arrives, the blessed Holy One, who knows those spirits and souls, unites them as at first and issues a proclamation. When they unite they become a single body, a single soul, right and left, fittingly. So, There is nothing new under the sun.
Now, you might say ‘But we have learned: Coupling accords only with a person’s conduct. So it is! For if he is virtuous and his actions seemly, then he attains his—uniting as when issuing....
It has been taught in the mystery of the Mishnah (interpreting Moed Katan 18b): ‘All those arriving through cycling souls can anticipate their mates by supplication.’ Concerning this our Companions aroused: Lest another anticipate him by supplication
Well spoken: ‘another,’ precisely! So coupling is difficult for the blessed Holy One [since the recycled soul replaces the originally intended husband. In order to reunite the latter with his soul mate, God has to eliminate the interloper, but still, the ways of YHWH are right… (Hosea 14:10).
Rabbi Yehudah sent a question to Rabbi El’azar: ‘I know the mystery of the matter, but those who arrive through cycling souls—where do they find their mates? He sent back to him: ‘It is written: How can we provide wives for those who remain? (Judges 21:7). And then: Seize for yourselves… (ibid., 21). The episode of the Benjaminites demonstrates this. Therefore we have learned: lest another anticipate.
Shalom Arush
"If you stood under the chuppa with a person, the that's your mate, your bashert. Hashem makes no mistakes. And, when a person was forced to get a divorce, that's Hashem's will too. It's all part of a person's soul correction."