Save "What is Nisuin? (And Why doesn't Anyone Seem to Care?)- part 2
"
What is Nisuin? (And Why doesn't Anyone Seem to Care?)- part 2

1. Last week we showed the contrast between the clear instructions of how to do Kiddushin vs the lack of any direction of how to do Nisuin.

2. We asked what Nisuin does that is seperate from kiddushin and came up with two answers. First, we saw that Kiddushin forbids the woman to other men, and even forbids the women to her husband. It is Nisuin that allows the man to have relations with his wife. Second, We learned (from shemot 21:10) that there are three obligations that a husband must take responsibility for his wife -- food, clothing and relations -- and this obligation seems to apply after Nisuin, not after Kiddushin. In contrast, a woman has to give the fruit of her labor during the marriage to her husband. So sexual permission and a shared economic life seem to occur only at the stage of Nisuin, not Kiddushin.

4. We saw that this two step process of marriage is from Tanach/the Bible itself. In some ways, the confirmation of the ancientness of this two-step process in Judaism simply underscores the question -- why is Nisuin not clearly defined in the Talmud?

Let us ask the next question -- when does Nisuin begin?

מתני׳ לעולם היא ברשות האב עד שתכנס
MISHNA: Even after she is betrothed, a daughter is always under her father’s authority until she enters

לרשות הבעל לנשואין

her husband’s authority in marriage via the wedding canopy.

לרשות הבעל לנשואין - כלומר שתכנס לחופה לשם נשואין שתהא מסורה לרשות הבעל:

To the territory of the Husband for Nisuin: I.e. that you bring her to the Chuppah (Marriage Canopy) for the purpose of Nisuin, so that she can enter into the territory of the husband.

Rabbi Steinsaltz - "This is the version of the text that Rashi had. However, most early authorities accepted an alternative version of the text that read: 'A daughter is always under the authority of her father until she enters the wedding canopy. They rejected Rashi's text because of the unusual style and in light of the subsequent Gemara, which... cites the alternate version of the text.'"

So what is the Chuppah?

There seem to be two (or three?) models suggested by the Rishonim.

The Rambam - (1135 -1204)

Spain (1135-1160s?), Fez (1160s?-1168), Egypt (1168-1204)

(א) הָאֲרוּסָה אֲסוּרָה לְבַעְלָהּ מִדִּבְרֵי סוֹפְרִים כָּל זְמַן שֶׁהִיא בְּבֵית אָבִיהָ. וְהַבָּא עַל אֲרוּסָתוֹ בְּבֵית חָמִיו מַכִּין אוֹתוֹ מַכַּת מַרְדּוּת. וַאֲפִלּוּ אִם קִדְּשָׁהּ בְּבִיאָה אָסוּר לוֹ לָבוֹא עָלֶיהָ בִּיאָה שְׁנִיָּה בְּבֵית אָבִיהָ עַד שֶׁיָּבִיא אוֹתָהּ לְתוֹךְ בֵּיתוֹ וְיִתְיַחֵד עִמָּהּ וְיַפְרִישֶׁנָּהּ לוֹ. וְיִחוּד זֶה הוּא הַנִּקְרָא כְּנִיסָה לַחֻפָּה וְהוּא הַנִּקְרָא נִשּׂוּאִין בְּכָל מָקוֹם. 0)(וְהַבָּא עַל אֲרוּסָתוֹ לְשֵׁם נִשּׂוּאִין אַחַר שֶׁקִּדְּשָׁהּ מִשֶּׁיְּעָרֶה בָּהּ קְנָאָהּ וְנַעֲשֵׂית נְשׂוּאָה וַהֲרֵי הִיא אִשְׁתּוֹ לְכָל דָּבָר: )

The engaged woman (arusah) is prohibited to her husband as a rabbinic decree for the whole time she is in her father's house. And if the husband has sex with arusah (engaged wife) in her father's house he will get lashes. And even if they fulfilled kiddushin (engagement) via sex, he still cannot engage in relations with her a second time in her father's house until she comes into his house and is he is secluded with her (and she seperates from the father?). And this seclusion is called "entering the chuppah" and it is called "nisuin" everywhere....

(ב) כֵּיוָן שֶׁנִּכְנְסָה הָאֲרוּסָה לַחֻפָּה הֲרֵי זוֹ מֻתֶּרֶת לָבֹא עָלֶיהָ בְּכָל עֵת שֶׁיִּרְצֶה וַהֲרֵי הִיא אִשְׁתּוֹ גְּמוּרָה לְכָל דָּבָר. וּמִשֶּׁתִּכָּנֵס לַחֻפָּה נִקְרֵאת נְשׂוּאָה אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁלֹּא נִבְעֲלָה וְהוּא שֶׁתִּהְיֶה רְאוּיָה לִבְעִילָה. אֲבָל אִם הָיְתָה נִדָּה אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁנִּכְנְסָה לַחֻפָּה וְנִתְיַחֵד עִמָּהּ לֹא גָּמְרוּ הַנִּשּׂוּאִין וַהֲרֵי הִיא כַּאֲרוּסָה עֲדַיִן:

Once the Arusa (engaged woman) enters the chuppah, he is allowed to have sex with her and she is considered his wife completely for all matters. And when she enters the chuppah she is called a nisuah (married woman) even if they did not have relations, just as long that he was ready or able to have sex. However, if she was in niddah, even if she entered the chuppah and was secluded with him, they did not finish the Nisuin (marriage) and she is still considerd and Arusa (engaged).

Ramabam's definition of Chuppah is the couple being in a private space for the sake of marriage (nisuin) , where they have the ability -- and halachic permission -- to have sex. Even if they do not engage in relations, the ability to have sex is considered the consummation of the marriage, or the completion of Nisuin. Importantly, therefore, if the couple is halachically not fit to have sex -- like in the case where the woman is in Nidah -- then the chupah is

The Ran

Commentary on the Rif 1(a) to Ketubot, dibur hamatchil (D"H) "O Pirseh Nidah" -- "or if she has begun menstruating"

או שפירסה נדה. איכא דיליף לה מהכא דחופה היינו יחוד, ולפיכך כשפירסה נדה -ולא בעל- אסורה להתיחד... ולאו בת חופה היא. [ומשום הכי] אינו מעלה לה מזונות. דאם איתא דחופה לאו היינו יחוד למה אינו מעלה לה מזונות והא חזיא לנשואין ולפי זה אין מכניסין את הכלה לחופה עד שתטהר...פירסה נדה כיון שאסורה להתיחד אי חופה היינו ייחוד לאו בת חופה היא

Or if she has begun Menstruating: One can learn from here that Chuppah is Yichud (being secluded together), and therefore once she begins niddah (menstruating) - and they haven't (previously had sex before she became a Niddah) - they are not allowed to be in Yichud / secluded together. For she is not "Bat Chuppah" (appropriate for Chuppah). And therefore the husband does not have to feed her. For if Chuppah wasn't Yichud (seclusion), why wouldn't he have to feed his wife, for she would be ready for Nissuin. Therefore, we learn (according to this opinion) that a woman cannot go to the chuppah until she has purified herself after Niddah....

ומיהו בדיעבד (מהניא דכיון דאסיקנא בפרק הבא על יבמתו (דף נז ב)) דיש חופה לפסולות, כגון אלמנה לכהן גדול וחברותיה אע"ג דלא חזיין לעולם לביאה- וליחוד הא נמי- לא גרעה מינייהו אבל לכתחלה אין מכניסין אותה לחופה עד שתטהר אי חופה היינו יחוד כמו שכתוב במקצת מקומות

And nonetheless, B'dieved (not ideal, but good enough for jewish law)...we learn that there is Chuppah for women who should not have sex with their husbands. Like a Kohen Gadol (high priest) and a widow... even though they never allowed to have intercourse - or to be in Yichud/seclusion together - we don't prevent them (from getting married)... but lichatchila (ideally according to jewish law) you shouldn't allow them to go to Chuppah until she is purified from Niddah.

ואחרים אומרים דחופה לאו היינו יחוד. וראיה לדבר מדאמרינן לקמן [דף יב. ע"ש] דאלמנה מן הנשואין אין לה אלא מנה אע"פ שעדים מעידין עליה שלא נסתרה ולא נבעלה אלמא חופה לאו היינו יחוד אלא חופה היינו כל שהביאה הבעל מבית אביה לביתו לשם נשואין...ולפי שאנו נוהגין עכשי ולעשות חופה בלא יחוד אין אנו מקפידין אם היא נדה אם לאו ומכל מקום כשר הדבר שלא תכנס לחופה עד שתטהר

And others say that Chuppah is not Yichud/seclusion: And a proof for this comes from 12b, where a widow after nisuin gets 100 maneh (from her ketubah), even in the case where witnesses testify that she was not in yichud/seclusion with her husband and could not have had sex with him. Therefore Yichud/seclusion cannot be (the definition of) Chuppah. Rather Chuppah is when the husband brings the woman from the father's house to his own house for the purposes of fulfilling nisuin...And since we don't act this way today, and we allow chuppah without Yichud/seclusion, we are not makpid (strict) if the woman is in Niddah or not. In any event (the nisuin) is kosher and we don't make her wait until she is purified from Nidah to make her enter the chupah.

The Ran - Nissim of Gerona (Wikipedia)

Nissim ben Reuven (1320 – 9th of Shevat, 1376, Hebrew: נסים בן ראובן) of Girona, Catalonia was an influential talmudist and authority on Jewish law. He was one of the last of the great Spanish medieval talmudic scholars. He is also known as the RaN (ר"ן), the Hebrew acronym of his name, as well as the RaNbaR (רנב"ר), the Hebrew acronym of his full name, including his father's name, Reuven (ראובן).[1]

Biography

Nissim was born in Barcelona, Catalonia. He was a physician and had knowledge of astronomy. His teacher is not known; his works refer to a R. Perez as morenu ("our teacher"), but it is thought that his father, Reuben b. Nissim, was his primary teacher. He was considered the greatest Halachic authority of his generation, and queries were sent to him from throughout the Jewish diaspora. His closest disciples were the Isaac ben Sheshet and Hasdai Crescas.

In his analyses, Nissim frequently refutes other rishonim; in his legal rulings however, he generally adopts their opinions in practice. He was "no friend of mysticism", and even reproved Nahmanides for devoting too much time to the Kabbalah.

Works

His best-known work is his commentary and explanation of Isaac Alfasi's "Sefer Ha-halachot", which had, at that time, been adopted for practical decisions. He is very detailed and explicit where the subject is important from a practical point of view, but extremely brief when dealing with theory. Ran did not write the commentary on all of Alfasi, although the whole commentary is often ascribed to him. Ran is now printed with Alfasi in all standard editions of the Talmud.

Ran also wrote a commentary on the Talmud. The commentary is oriented toward practical decisions as opposed to theory. The commentary has been printed only on some tractates, the rest exists in manuscript or has been lost.

Other works include, responsa, a recently published commentary on the Bible, a work of philosophy, and a collection of sermons ("Derashot Ha'Ran").

The Ran as the last great Sephardic (Spanish) Rabbi: Historical Context

Ferrand Martinez, Archdeacon of Ecijia, directed a 13-year anti-Semitic campaign that began in 1378. Martinez used a series of provocative sermons, through which he openly condemned the Jews with little to no opposition. He rallied non-Jews against the Jews by creating a constant state of fear through riots. Martinez’s efforts led to a series of outbreaks on June 4, 1391,[3] where several synagogues in Seville were burned to the ground and churches were erected in their place. Amidst this outbreak, many Jews fled the country, some converted to Christianity in fear, and some were sold to Muslims. Martinez set in motion the largest forced mass conversion of Jews in Spain.[3]

Both the Church and the Crown had not anticipated such a large-scale conversion stemming from an unplanned anti-Semitic campaign led by Ferrand Martinez. The new converts, most of whom were forced, due to their large numbers, were victims of a new problem. A problem that temporarily solved the Jewish presence in Spain, however, led to the creation of a new group that was neither completely Catholic or Jewish.[4]

The conversos, who were now fully privileged citizens, competed in all aspects of the economic sphere. This resulted in a new wave of racial anti-Semitism that was targeted at the conversos. This anti-Semitism evolved into small and large riots in Toledo, 1449, that now oppressed not the Jews by the Christians, but the New Christians (conversos) by the Old Christians. Thus, the Crown established a National Inquisition in 1478, that would test the loyalty and purity of a newly baptized Christian (converso). Due to continued oppression, some Jews and conversos fled Spain, others created a community that ensure the survival of Judaism in the Iberian Peninsula, although outwardly practising Christianity.[4]

איתמר רב אמר
§ The Gemara cites a dispute with regard to an issue related to the previous discussion. It was stated that the amora’im disagreed about the following question. Rav said:
יש חופה לפסולות ושמואל אמר אין חופה לפסולות
There is significance to a priest entering a wedding canopy with women who are unfit to marry a priest. If a priest’s daughter who is unfit to marry a priest enters the wedding canopy with a priest, she becomes disqualified from partaking of teruma from her father’s household. This is the case even if the priest did not betroth her and they did not engage in sexual intercourse. And Shmuel said: There is no significance to a priest entering the wedding canopy with women who are unfit to marry a priest. Only sexual intercourse disqualifies her from the privileges of priesthood.
יש חופה לפסולות. שאם לקח כהן אשה האסורה לו והיא בת כהן, והכניסה לחופה בלא שקידשה קודם לכן, אף שלא בא עליה, הרי עצם הכניסה לחופה עושה אותה כנשואה לו, והיא נפסלת משעה זו לכהונה ונאסרת לאכול בתרומת אביה. ושמואל אמר: אין חופה לפסולות. שעצם הכנסת נשים פסולות לחופה, אינה פוסלת, אלא ביאה בלבד היא שפוסלת אותן.

If a Kohen took for a wife that is prohibited to him, and she happens to be a Bat-Kohen (a daughter of another Kohen) and he brought her under the Chuppah before Kiddushin, even if they did not have sex, the entering the chuppah makes her a Nisuah (wife) for him, and she is pasul for Kehunah and she cannot eat the terumah of her father.

And Shmuel says that Chuppah doesn't pasul her -- that bringing her under the chuppah doesn't pasul her (and she can eat from her father's terumah). Rather, intercourse alone would pasul her.

(א) דין ארוסה לענין מזונות וקבורה וירושה ואם יש כתובה ובו ז סעיפים:
הארוסה אסורה לבעלה מדברי סופרים כל זמן שהיא בבית אביה והבא על ארוסתו בבית חמיו מכין אותו מכת מרדות: הגה ואפי' בייחוד אסורים ולכן ארוס שהוא עם ארוסתו בבית א' מברכין ז' ברכות פן יתייחדו (מרדכי פ"ק דכתובות) וי"א דאין להם לדור ביחד שלא יקוצו זה בזה (כל בו) ואפי' בשדוכין בלא אירוסין יש לחוש (חידושי אגודה פרק קמא דכתובות) אפילו אם קדשה בביאה אסור לו לבא עליה ביאה שניה בבית אביה עד שיביא אותה לתוך ביתו ויתייחד עמה ויפרישנה לו ויחוד זה הוא הנקרא כניסה לחופה והיא הנקרא נישואין בכל מקום והבא על ארוסתו לשם נשואין אחר שקידשה משיערה בה קנאה ונעשית נשואה והרי היא כאשתו לכל דבר וצריך לברך ברכת חתנים בבית החתן קודם הנישואין: הגה וי"א דחופה אינו יחוד אלא כל שהביאה החתן לביתו לשם נשואין (כ"כ הר"ן בשי"א ריש כתובות) וי"א שהחופה היא שפורסין סודר על ראשה בשעת הברכה (הב"י הביאו) וי"א דחופת בתולה משיצאה בהינומא ואלמנה משנתייחדו (תוס' פ"ק דיומא) והמנהג פשוט עכשיו לקרות חופה מקום שמכניסין יריעה פרוסה על גבי כלונסות ומכניסין תחתיה החתן והכלה ברבים ומקדשה שם ומברכין שם ברכת ארוסין ונשואין ואח"כ מוליכים אותם לביתם ואוכלין ביחד במקום צנוע וזה החופה הנוהגת עכשיו ע' לקמן סי' ס"ב סעיף ט' וסימן ס':

(1) One who is merely engaged is forbidden to her husband according to the rabbis while she is still in her father's house, and one who has relations with his fiancee in his father-in-laws house receives lashes from the rabbis. [Rema: They are even forbidden to be secluded and therefore if an engaged couple are living together, they say the seven brachot lest they become secluded (Mordechai First Chapter of Ketubot). There are those who say they should not live together lest they become repulsed by one another]. Even with couples that are not engaged there is concern, even if they became engaged through relations, he cannot sleep with her a second time in her father's house until he brings her into his house, is secluded with her and separates her for himself, and this seclusion is known as entering into the Chuppah and it is called marriage in all places. One who sleeps with his fiancee for the purposes of marriage after he engaged her, once he enters her he has acquired her and she is married to him and is his wife, and they must say the Groom's blessings in the grooms house before the marriage. [Rema: There are those who say that the chuppah is not considered seclusion rather the groom must bring her into his house for the purposes of marriage (Thus says the Ran at the beginning of Ketubot) And there are those who say that the Chuppah is when they spread a cloth over her head at the time of the blessing, and there are those who say that a virgin's chuppah is when she goes out in a headdress and for a widow when they become secluded. The simple custom nowadays to call the chuppah a place where they place a cloth on poles and bring the groom and bride underneath in public and he engages her there and they say the blessings of engagement and marriage and then they walk them to their house and they eat together in a secluded places, this is how the chuppah is done now.]

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible on our site. Click OK to continue using Sefaria. Learn More.OKאנחנו משתמשים ב"עוגיות" כדי לתת למשתמשים את חוויית השימוש הטובה ביותר.קראו עוד בנושאלחצו כאן לאישור