בָּרוּךְ אַתָּה ה' אֱלהֵינוּ מֶלֶךְ הָעולָם אֲשֶׁר קִדְּשָׁנוּ בְּמִצְותָיו וְצִוָּנוּ לַעֲסוק בְּדִבְרֵי תורָה:
Blessing for Torah Study
Barukh Atah Adonai Eloheinu Melekh Ha'Olam Asher Kideshanu Bemitzvotav Vetzivanu La'asok Bedivrei Torah
Blessed are you Adonai, our God, Sovereign of Eternity, who has made us uniquely sacred through Your mitzvot (sacred callings) and called upon us to immerse ourselves in the words of Torah.
November 18, 2023 / 5 Kislev 5784
Summary of Torah Portion from ReformJudaism.org
Summary of Torah Portion from ReformJudaism.org
- Rebekah has twins, Esau and Jacob. (25:19-26)
- Esau gives Jacob his birthright in exchange for some stew. (25:27-34)
- King Abimelech is led to think that Rebekah is Isaac's sister and later finds out that she is his wife. (26:1-16)
- Isaac plans to bless Esau, his firstborn. Rebekah and Jacob deceive Isaac so that Jacob receives the blessing. (27:1-29)
- Esau threatens to kill Jacob, who then flees to Haran. (27:30-45)
Turn to Torah Commentaries and read Chapter 25:19-34
We Begin with Kushiyot/Challenges/Difficulties in the Text:
- Grammatical inconsistencies (Words repeated, something left out, sentences that seem to not make sense)
- Theological inconsistencies (The Torah tells us something that is morally problematic or a character does something that isn't right)
- Ambiguities (Torah says something that can be interpreted in more than one way)
- Metaphor (The Torah uses a word or a phrase that isn't meant literally, but is figurative)
- Contradictions (The Torah says one thing here, another thing there)
- Superfluous language (The Torah includes information that doesn't seem important)
- Narrative Inconsistencies (The sequence of events is unclear or out of order)
As we read the following texts, ask yourself , what Questions/Kushiyot arise for you?
How do the Commentaries characterize the two brothers?
ויתרוצצו. עַ"כָּ הַמִּקְרָא הַזֶּה אוֹמֵר דָּרְשֵׁנִי, שֶׁסָּתַם מַה הִיא רְצִיצָה זוֹ וְכָתַב אִם כֵּן לָמָּה זֶּה אָנֹכִי? רַבּוֹתֵינוּ דְּרָשׁוּהוּ לְשׁוֹן רִיצָה; כְּשֶׁהָיְתָה עוֹבֶרֶת עַל פִּתְחֵי תּוֹרָה שֶׁל שֵׁם וָעֵבֶר יַעֲקֹב רָץ וּמְפַרְכֵּס לָצֵאת, עוֹבֶרֶת עַל פֶּתַח עֲבוֹדַת אֱלִילִים, עֵשָׂו מְפַרְכֵּס לָצֵאת. דָּבָר אַחֵר מִתְרוֹצְצִים זֶה עִם זֶה וּמְרִיבִים בְּנַחֲלַת שְׁנֵי עוֹלָמוֹת.
ויתרצצו AND [THE CHILDREN] STRUGGLED — You must admit that this verse calls for a Midrashic interpretation since it leaves unexplained what this struggling was about and it states that she exclaimed “If it be so, wherefore did I desire this” (i.e. she asked whether this was the normal course of child-bearing, feeling that something extraordinary was happening). Our Rabbis explain that the word ויתרוצצו has the meaning of running, moving quickly: whenever she passed by the doors of the Torah (i. e. the Schools of Shem and Eber) Jacob moved convulsively in his efforts to come to birth, but whenever she passed by the gate of a pagan temple Esau moved convulsively in his efforts to come to birth (Genesis Rabbah 63:6). Another explanation is: they struggled with one another and quarrelled as to how they should divide the two worlds as their inheritance (Yalkut Shimoni on Torah 111:2).
ממעיך יפרדו. מִן הַמֵּעַיִם הֵם נִפְרָדִים זֶה לְרִשְׁעוֹ וְזֶה לְתֻמּוֹ:
ממעיך יפרדו SHALL BE PARTED FROM THY BOWELS —as soon as they leave thy body they will take each a different course — one to his wicked ways, the other to his plain life (Genesis 5:27)
ושני לאמים. שיהיו גם כן נבדלים במלכות:
ושני לאמים, they will also be politically different from one another, being separate kingdoms.
ממעיך יפרדו פרש״י ז״ל זה לצדקו וזה לרשעו ועדיין אין ידוע מי רשע ומי צדיק אבל משגדלו ויהי עשו איש יודע ציד ויעקב איש תם יושב אהלים.
ממעיך יפרדו, “they are fighting for separation from one another already in your womb. Rashi, on this expression, comments: “one wishes wickedness to prevail on earth, the other righteousness.” G-d implied that at this point in time the outcome of who would prevail in this struggle was not yet known. It would only become clear when the two children’s vocational choices had been made, one a hunter, the other a philosopher, making study his primary occupation.
אדמוני. סִימָן הוּא שֶׁיְּהֵא שׁוֹפֵךְ דָּמִים (בראשית רבה):
אדמוני RED — a sign that he would always be shedding blood (Genesis Rabbah 63:8).
ואחרי כן יצא אחיו וגו'. שָׁמַעְתִּי מִ"אַ הַדּוֹרְשׁוֹ לְפִי פְּשׁוּטוֹ, בְּדִין הָיָה אוֹחֵז בּוֹ לְעַכְּבוֹ, יַעֲקֹב נוֹצַר מִטִּפָּה רִאשׁוֹנָה וְעֵשָׂו מִן הַשְּׁנִיָּה; צֵא וּלְמַד מִשְּׁפוֹפֶרֶת שֶׁפִּיהָ קְצָרָה, תֵּן לָהּ שְׁתֵּי אֲבָנִים זוֹ אַחַר זוֹ – הַנִּכְנֶסֶת רִאשׁוֹנָה תֵּצֵא אַחֲרוֹנָה וְהַנִּכְנֶסֶת אַחֲרוֹנָה תֵּצֵא רִאשׁוֹנָה; נִמְצָא עֵשָׂו הַנּוֹצָר בָּאַחֲרוֹנָה יָצָא רִאשׁוֹן וְיַעֲקֹב שֶׁנּוֹצַר רִאשׁוֹנָה יָצָא אַחֲרוֹן, וְיַעֲקֹב בָּא לְעַכְּבוֹ, שֶׁיְּהֵא רִאשׁוֹן לְלֵדָה כְּרִאשׁוֹן לִיצִירָה, וְיִפְטֹר אֶת רַחְמָהּ וְיִטֹּל אֶת הַבְּכוֹרָה מִן הַדִּין:
ואחרי כן יצא אחיו וגו AND AFTERWARDS HIS BROTHER CAME OUT, ETC. — I have heard a homiletical midrash that expounds it according to its simple meaning: It was with justice that he was grabbing him to hold him back. Jacob was conceived from the first drop and Esau from the second. Go and learn from a tube with a narrow opening - put in it two stones, one after the other. The one that goes in first will come out last, and the one that goes in last will come out first. It comes out that Esau, who was conceived last, came out first, and Jacob, who was conceived first, came out last. And [so] Jacob came to hold him back, so that the first for birth would be the same as the first for conception; and he would open [his mother's] womb and take the first-born status with justice (see Genesis Rabbah 63:8).
בעקב עשו. סִימָן שֶׁאֵין זֶה מַסְפִּיק לִגְמֹר מַלְכוּתוֹ עַד שֶׁזֶּה עוֹמֵד וְנוֹטְלָהּ הֵימֶנּוּ:
בעקב עשו ESAU’S HEEL — a sign that this one (Esau) will hardly have time to complete his period of domination before the other would rise and take it (his power) from him
ויגדלו … ויהי עשו. כָּל זְמַן שֶׁהָיוּ קְטַנִּים, לֹא הָיוּ נִכָּרִים בְּמַעֲשֵׂיהֶם, וְאֵין אָדָם מְדַקְדֵּק בָּהֶם מַה טִּיבָם; כֵּיוָן שֶׁנַּעֲשׂוּ בְנֵי שְׁלשׁ עֶשְׂרֵה שָׁנָה, זֶה פֵּרֵשׁ לְבָתֵּי מִדְרָשׁוֹת וְזֶה פֵּרֵשׁ לַעֲ"זָ:
ויגדלו… ויהי עשו AND THEY GREW … AND ESAU WAS — So long as they were young they could not be distinguished by what they did and no one paid much attention to their characters, but when they reached the age of thirteen, one went his way to the houses of learning and the other went his way to the idolatrous temples (Genesis Rabbah 63:10).
ידע ציד. לָצוּד וּלְרַמּוֹת אֶת אָבִיו בְּפִיו וְשׁוֹאֲלוֹ אַבָּא, הַאֵיךְ מְעַשְּׂרִין אֶת הַמֶּלַח וְאֶת הַתֶּבֶן? כַּסָּבוּר אָבִיו שֶׁהוּא מְדַקְדֵּק בְּמִצְוֹת (תנחומא):
יודע ציד A CUNNING HUNTER literally, understanding hunting — understanding how to entrap and deceive his father with his mouth. He would ask him, “Father how should salt and straw be tithed”? (Genesis Rabbah 63:10) (although he knew full well that these are not subject to the law of tithe). Consequently his father believed him to be very punctilious in observing the divine ordinances.
יודע ציד. לעולם מלא מרמות כי רוב החיות בדרך מרמה יתפשו ויעקב הפך עשו כי הוא איש תם. גם עשו איש שדה. ויעקב יושב אהלים. ויתכן להיות פירושו כמו יושב אהל ומקנה:
A CUNNING HUNTER. Esau was constantly practicing deception, for most animals are trapped through trickery. Jacob was his antithesis, because he was a man of integrity. They also differed in that Esau was a man of the field and Jacob a man dwelling in tents. It is possible that the meaning of dwelling in tents is like dwell in tents and have cattle (Gen. 4:20).
יושב אוהלים. שני מיני אהלים האחד אהל רועי והשני אהל בל יצען שבו התבונן להכיר בוראו ונקדש בכבודו:
יושב אהלים, the plural mode indicates that the Torah speaks of two distinctly different kinds of tents; one is the tent used by shepherds, the other the tent described as בל-יצען described in Isaiah 33,20, (a reference to Jerusalem or the Temple). The function of that “tent” is to help people come closer to G’d and to gain insight into His ways and as a result to become holy, inspired by His glory.
תם. אֵינוֹ בָקִי בְכָל אֵלֶּה, כְּלִבּוֹ כֵּן פִּיו, מִי שֶׁאֵינוֹ חָרִיף לְרַמּוֹת קָרוּי תָּם:
תם A PLAIN MAN — not expert in all these things: as his heart was his mouth (his thoughts and his words tallied). One who is not ingenious in deceiving people is called תם plain, simple.
Questions about the dooming of innocent children are of course unanswerable. I would only observe that the notion that Esau was “hated” by God from the womb is less an element of the original story than the consequence of later archetypal readings. That process, building on the eponymous character of the two brothers, was obviously well under way by the time of Malachi. In the rabbinical period Esau’s fate was sealed as Esau-Edom became the symbol of Rome, the archetype of pagan iniquity and brutal oppression. Rashi, writing in the 11th century, reads Genesis through the optic of that archetypical tradition, but the original story offers a more multifaceted portrait of Esau and leaves God’s moral judgment of the older twin in the realm of uncertain inference. Esau is clearly destined to lose the birthright, but we are left to wonder at times about the moral status of the brother who wrests the birthright for himself. - Robert Alter
As the story of our patriarchs and matriarchs continues, it is Jacob who struggles with the angel and is then renamed Israel, the name that adorns our people even until today. Jacob's two wives and two concubines give birth to the descendants whose names become the very organizing principle of the twelve tribes of Israel. And Jacob will serve as a main character in the drama of his son Joseph, who himself plays such a pivotal role in the transition to Egypt that leads to the ultimate covenant and redemption of the Jewish people. That is to say: Jacob is just too much of an insider for later commentators to dismantle his reputation without doing damage to the entire Jewish people.
Esau, on the other hand, wanders out of the frame of the Torah's view, and the Edomites/Idumeans who bear his name continue to be a competing and sometimes hostile neighboring people long after the Torah's stories are committed to parchment. Long after the writing of the Torah, this people disappears into the mists of history, and aside from some fascinating archaeological remains, there is little to tell their story nowadays. Familiar with their early character and their later outcome, our commentators stress how alien their progenitor Esau is from his very birth, and make him out to be an evil individual at every opportunity.
(Rabbi Aaron D. Panken, z'l)
Esau, on the other hand, wanders out of the frame of the Torah's view, and the Edomites/Idumeans who bear his name continue to be a competing and sometimes hostile neighboring people long after the Torah's stories are committed to parchment. Long after the writing of the Torah, this people disappears into the mists of history, and aside from some fascinating archaeological remains, there is little to tell their story nowadays. Familiar with their early character and their later outcome, our commentators stress how alien their progenitor Esau is from his very birth, and make him out to be an evil individual at every opportunity.
(Rabbi Aaron D. Panken, z'l)
Aside from God's providence and Esau's angry threat, Esau actually seems to have done little to merit his negative status in history. The Bible identifies him as the father of Edom and Amalek, two tribes that were enemies of the Hebrews. The Rabbis drew a further connection by associating Esau and Edom with Rome, thereby linking Esau to the destruction of Judaism. The midrash describes Esau as an idolater (Genesis Rabbah 63:6), a murderer ( Pirkei D' Rabbi Eliezer 24), and one who spoke disrespectfully to his father (Tanchuma, Toldot 11), thus adding troubling details about Esau that are absent from the biblical text.
Why is the Rabbis' portrayal of Esau so negative? Perhaps it is because the drama of the Israelites' story required rivals whose actions and natures contrasted with the values embodied in Jacob. The Rabbis used the brothers' characteristics to teach us lessons about behavior. Hence rabbinic literature crafted an ideal embodied by Jacob, who was quiet, studious, thoughtful, and emotionally in control. On the other hand, Esau's unbridled passion was problematic for the Rabbis, who struggled with emotion. As it is written, "Who is mighty? One who controls one's natural urges" (Pirkei Avot 4:1).
(Debra Pine)
Why is the Rabbis' portrayal of Esau so negative? Perhaps it is because the drama of the Israelites' story required rivals whose actions and natures contrasted with the values embodied in Jacob. The Rabbis used the brothers' characteristics to teach us lessons about behavior. Hence rabbinic literature crafted an ideal embodied by Jacob, who was quiet, studious, thoughtful, and emotionally in control. On the other hand, Esau's unbridled passion was problematic for the Rabbis, who struggled with emotion. As it is written, "Who is mighty? One who controls one's natural urges" (Pirkei Avot 4:1).
(Debra Pine)
The ancient rabbis, having been exiled from the land, tended to think of Esau as Rome, and of Rome as embodying the worst aspects of the persecution that they experienced. But this one-sided view is problematic. While acknowledging "Esau is a symbol of hate," Nehama Leibowitz also points to midrashim that show Esau's humanity. As she writes in "New Studies in Bereshit (Genesis)": "In the Torah…Esau is a human being, the son of Isaac and Rebecca...like all human beings he has his good and bad sides."
For example, when Esau speaks of exacting revenge on Jacob, he also decides to wait until the mourning period for their father has passed. It is a small thing, but it is still noteworthy that in the heat of the moment he prioritizes his father's need for comfort over his own desires.
If we were to take the twins as archetypes, we might want to think of them as two facets of the same personality, rather than two types of people. Each of us has a shadow to our personality, a side that includes the aspects we do not wish to acknowledge.
In the case of Jacob and Esau, we see Esau acting as a foil to Jacob's competitive side. Esau does not want to be the one who stops at nothing to win. Jacob hates his competitive brother Esau - which is, in fact, a form of hating himself. After all, is he not the one who tricks his brother Esau to get Isaac's blessing?
So often, what we hate in others is what we refuse to acknowledge in ourselves.
We might fantasize about vanquishing our foes, but the reality is this: there is no total victory. Your shadow side remains, that part of yourself that has not yet been acknowledged. The more you fight it, the stronger it becomes.
How can we heal a broken world where the shadow side will not be repressed? How do we move past this and allow ourselves to be whole?
The first step is to recognize and accept the fullness of human experience. We all have within us a yetzer ha-tov (an impulse to do good) and a yetzer ha-ra (an impulse to do bad).
The second step is to learn to love our entire selves, including the parts that are jagged or difficult. Redemption is not achieving everything you ever wanted; it is the state of seeing things as they are and wholeheartedly accepting them.
(Rabbi Kari Tuling)
For example, when Esau speaks of exacting revenge on Jacob, he also decides to wait until the mourning period for their father has passed. It is a small thing, but it is still noteworthy that in the heat of the moment he prioritizes his father's need for comfort over his own desires.
If we were to take the twins as archetypes, we might want to think of them as two facets of the same personality, rather than two types of people. Each of us has a shadow to our personality, a side that includes the aspects we do not wish to acknowledge.
In the case of Jacob and Esau, we see Esau acting as a foil to Jacob's competitive side. Esau does not want to be the one who stops at nothing to win. Jacob hates his competitive brother Esau - which is, in fact, a form of hating himself. After all, is he not the one who tricks his brother Esau to get Isaac's blessing?
So often, what we hate in others is what we refuse to acknowledge in ourselves.
We might fantasize about vanquishing our foes, but the reality is this: there is no total victory. Your shadow side remains, that part of yourself that has not yet been acknowledged. The more you fight it, the stronger it becomes.
How can we heal a broken world where the shadow side will not be repressed? How do we move past this and allow ourselves to be whole?
The first step is to recognize and accept the fullness of human experience. We all have within us a yetzer ha-tov (an impulse to do good) and a yetzer ha-ra (an impulse to do bad).
The second step is to learn to love our entire selves, including the parts that are jagged or difficult. Redemption is not achieving everything you ever wanted; it is the state of seeing things as they are and wholeheartedly accepting them.
(Rabbi Kari Tuling)
