Shabbat Zakhor: Remember what Amalek did to you
What different lessons might someone draw from this text?
(2) “Thus said the LORD of Hosts: I am exacting the penalty for what Amalek did to Israel, for the assault he made upon them on the road, on their way up from Egypt. (3) Now go, attack Amalek, and proscribe all that belongs to him. Spare no one, but kill alike men and women, infants and sucklings, oxen and sheep, camels and asses!” (4) Saul mustered the troops and enrolled them at Telaim: 200,000 men on foot, and 10,000 men of Judah. (5) Then Saul advanced as far as the city of Amalek and lay in wait in the wadi.
Rabbi Miles B. Cohen
The Rabbis prescribed that we fulfill this commandment once a year by reading this passage publicly from a Torah scroll. They assigned this reading to the Shabbat before Purim to connect blotting out the name of Amalek to the Purim practice of blotting out the name of Haman, who was, according to tradition, a descendant of Amalek.
Eden Glaser, "On Roots and Inheritance"
We can learn one of two things, depending on how we choose to interpret. The lesson is either do not harm others especially while they are vulnerable or, more violently, take revenge on those who have harmed you. In other words, do not do to your enemies as they have done to you or seek recompense at all costs. The question is: Which is our inheritance?
Vulnerability and Recompense in the Book of Esther
Vulnerability
Fighting Back
(ב) וַיֹּ֩אמֶר֩ הַמֶּ֨לֶךְ לְאֶסְתֵּ֜ר גַּ֣ם בַּיּ֤וֹם הַשֵּׁנִי֙ בְּמִשְׁתֵּ֣ה הַיַּ֔יִן מַה־שְּׁאֵלָתֵ֛ךְ אֶסְתֵּ֥ר הַמַּלְכָּ֖ה וְתִנָּ֣תֵֽן לָ֑ךְ וּמַה־בַּקָּשָׁתֵ֛ךְ עַד־חֲצִ֥י הַמַּלְכ֖וּת וְתֵעָֽשׂ׃ (ג) וַתַּ֨עַן אֶסְתֵּ֤ר הַמַּלְכָּה֙ וַתֹּאמַ֔ר אִם־מָצָ֨אתִי חֵ֤ן בְּעֵינֶ֙יךָ֙ הַמֶּ֔לֶךְ וְאִם־עַל־הַמֶּ֖לֶךְ ט֑וֹב תִּנָּֽתֶן־לִ֤י נַפְשִׁי֙ בִּשְׁאֵ֣לָתִ֔י וְעַמִּ֖י בְּבַקָּשָׁתִֽי׃ (ד) כִּ֤י נִמְכַּ֙רְנוּ֙ אֲנִ֣י וְעַמִּ֔י לְהַשְׁמִ֖יד לַהֲר֣וֹג וּלְאַבֵּ֑ד וְ֠אִלּ֠וּ לַעֲבָדִ֨ים וְלִשְׁפָח֤וֹת נִמְכַּ֙רְנוּ֙ הֶחֱרַ֔שְׁתִּי כִּ֣י אֵ֥ין הַצָּ֛ר שֹׁוֶ֖ה בְּנֵ֥זֶק הַמֶּֽלֶךְ׃ {ס}
(2) On the second day, the king again asked Esther at the wine feast, “What is your wish, Queen Esther? It shall be granted you. And what is your request? Even to half the kingdom, it shall be fulfilled.” (3) Queen Esther replied: “If Your Majesty will do me the favor, and if it pleases Your Majesty, let my life be granted me as my wish, and my people as my request. (4) For we have been sold, my people and I, to be destroyed, massacred, and exterminated. Had we only been sold as bondmen and bondwomen, I would have kept silent; for the adversary is not worthy of the king’s trouble.”
(י) וַיִּכְתֹּ֗ב בְּשֵׁם֙ הַמֶּ֣לֶךְ אֲחַשְׁוֵרֹ֔שׁ וַיַּחְתֹּ֖ם בְּטַבַּ֣עַת הַמֶּ֑לֶךְ וַיִּשְׁלַ֣ח סְפָרִ֡ים בְּיַד֩ הָרָצִ֨ים בַּסּוּסִ֜ים רֹכְבֵ֤י הָרֶ֙כֶשׁ֙ הָֽאֲחַשְׁתְּרָנִ֔ים בְּנֵ֖י הָֽרַמָּכִֽים׃ (יא) אֲשֶׁר֩ נָתַ֨ן הַמֶּ֜לֶךְ לַיְּהוּדִ֣ים ׀ אֲשֶׁ֣ר בְּכׇל־עִיר־וָעִ֗יר לְהִקָּהֵל֮ וְלַעֲמֹ֣ד עַל־נַפְשָׁם֒ לְהַשְׁמִיד֩ וְלַהֲרֹ֨ג וּלְאַבֵּ֜ד אֶת־כׇּל־חֵ֨יל עַ֧ם וּמְדִינָ֛ה הַצָּרִ֥ים אֹתָ֖ם טַ֣ף וְנָשִׁ֑ים וּשְׁלָלָ֖ם לָבֽוֹז׃
(10) He had them written in the name of King Ahasuerus and sealed with the king’s signet. Letters were dispatched by mounted couriers, riding steeds used in the king’s service, bred of the royal stud, (11) to this effect: The king has permitted the Jews of every city to assemble and fight for their lives; if any people or province attacks them, they may destroy, massacre, and exterminate its armed force together with women and children, and plunder their possessions—
- What do you notice between these two passages?
- What is the effect of this repetitive language?
(16) The rest of the Jews, those in the king’s provinces, likewise mustered and fought for their lives. They disposed of their enemies, killing seventy-five thousand of their foes; but they did not lay hands on the spoil. (17) That was on the thirteenth day of the month of Adar; and they rested on the fourteenth day and made it a day of feasting and merrymaking.
- Why do you think the Jews responded the way they did?
- Why does Esther ask for a continuation of the edict?
- Why do they have a celebration at the end?
- What legal or halachic concepts apply to questions of revenge and justice?
If it is possible to save the pursued by damaging one of the limbs of the rodef, one should. Thus, if one can strike him with an arrow, a stone or a sword, and cut off his hand, break his leg, blind him or in another way prevent him from achieving his objective, one should do so.
If there is no way to be precise in one's aim and save the person being pursued without killing the rodef, one should kill him, even though he has not yet killed his victim. This is implied by Deuteronomy 25:11-12, which states: "If a man is fighting with his brother, and the wife of one... grabs the attacker by his private parts, you must cut off her hand; you may not show pity."
Eden Glaser, "On Roots and Inheritance"
The lesson is that one should neither rely on miracles nor allow a metaphoric drunkenness to pervade into their sense of what is right, good, and proper...What we learn from this story is that there is a danger in an inebriated morality—when one is drunk with power they can, even accidentally, kill someone. There is an antidote to a pervasive violence: historical awareness. Rabbi Zeira chooses not to engage in the same behavior that caused him harm. We, too, should remember our past in order to avoid the blindness of the intoxicating, vengeful temptations of the present. We must somehow simultaneously remember and destroy Amalek, eradicating cyclical violence but not eradicating the lessons it teaches.
This is our inheritance: a near-boundless collection of text and teaching that helps us strive toward a recognition of common humanity. Indeed, our Torah is not just derived from the same root as “shooting,” but it is famously a tree of life when we grasp it firmly. And hold onto it we must: we must hold onto the life-giving lessons embedded in our Torah. We must choose life and love our neighbor. We also must do these things while balancing the truism that our text is also full of violence and vengeance.
So long as we elect to remember our enemies and the horrors they wrought on our biblical and historical ancestors or in the present day, we need not superimpose their wickedness on innocent, living human beings. Let us remember the evil that Amalek did to our ancestors—attack them when they were famished and weary in the desert—and vow to stand up against it when we see others do the same in our day.