How to wear a kippa

So, you’re thinking of wearing a kippa. What are the rules? Who can wear one? When and how should one wear one?

Let’s look at the texts! Starting with a potential origin story:

וּמִדְּרַב נַחְמָן בַּר יִצְחָק נָמֵי אֵין מַזָּל לְיִשְׂרָאֵל. דְּאִימֵּיהּ דְּרַב נַחְמָן בַּר יִצְחָק אָמְרִי לַהּ כַּלְדָּאֵי: בְּרִיךְ גַּנָּבָא הָוֵה. לָא שְׁבַקְתֵּיהּ גַּלּוֹיֵי רֵישֵׁיהּ. אֲמַרָה לֵיהּ: כַּסִּי רֵישָׁיךָ, כִּי הֵיכִי דְּתִיהְוֵי עֲלָךְ אֵימְתָא דִשְׁמַיָּא, וּבְעִי רַחֲמֵי. לָא הֲוָה יָדַע אַמַּאי קָאָמְרָה לֵיהּ. יוֹמָא חַד יָתֵיב קָא גָרֵיס תּוּתֵי דִיקְלָא, נְפַל גְּלִימָא מֵעִילָּוֵי רֵישֵׁיהּ, דְּלִי עֵינֵיהּ חֲזָא לְדִיקְלָא, אַלְּמֵיהּ יִצְרֵיהּ, סְלֵיק, פַּסְקֵיהּ לְקִיבּוּרָא בְּשִׁינֵּיהּ.

And from that which transpired to Rav Naḥman bar Yitzḥak as well it can be derived that there is no constellation for the Jewish people, As Chaldean astrologers told Rav Naḥman bar Yitzḥak’s mother: Your son will be a thief. She did not allow him to uncover his head. She said to her son: Cover your head so that the fear of Heaven will be upon you, and pray for Divine mercy. He did not know why she said this to him. One day he was sitting and studying beneath a palm tree that did not belong to him, and the cloak fell off of his head. He lifted his eyes and saw the palm tree. He was overcome by impulse and he climbed up and detached a bunch of dates with his teeth. Apparently, he had an inborn inclination to steal, but was able to overcome that inclination with proper education and prayer.

In this first story, Rav Nachman’s mother hears a prophecy that her son will be a thief, and in order to suppress this evil inclination, Nachman dons a head covering/cloak so as to maintain his “fear of Heaven.” When it falls off of his head, he immediately steals some fruit from his neighbor’s tree “with his teeth.” What a wild story!

Also interesting to note that the phrase "fear/awe of Heaven" is related to the word "yarmulke," which comes from the Aramaic phrase "yira Malka" (fear/awe of the King)!

תָּנֵי תַּנָּא קַמֵּיהּ דְּרַב נַחְמָן: בִּזְמַן שֶׁאָדָם מְצַעֵר אֶת אָבִיו וְאֶת אִמּוֹ אָמַר הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא: יָפֶה עָשִׂיתִי שֶׁלֹּא דַּרְתִּי בֵּינֵיהֶם, שֶׁאִלְמָלֵי דַּרְתִּי בֵּינֵיהֶם, צִיעֲרוּנִי. אָמַר רַבִּי יִצְחָק: כׇּל הָעוֹבֵר עֲבֵירָה בַּסֵּתֶר – כְּאִילּוּ דּוֹחֵק רַגְלֵי שְׁכִינָה. שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״כֹּה אָמַר ה׳ הַשָּׁמַיִם כִּסְאִי וְהָאָרֶץ הֲדֹם רַגְלָי״. אָמַר רַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ בֶּן לֵוִי: אָסוּר לְאָדָם שֶׁיְּהַלֵּךְ אַרְבַּע אַמּוֹת בְּקוֹמָה זְקוּפָה, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״מְלֹא כׇל הָאָרֶץ כְּבוֹדוֹ״. רַב הוּנָא בְּרֵיהּ דְּרַב יְהוֹשֻׁעַ לָא מְסַגֵּי אַרְבַּע אַמּוֹת בְּגִילּוּי הָרֹאשׁ. אָמַר: שְׁכִינָה לְמַעְלָה מֵרָאשֵׁי.

A tanna taught a baraita before Rav Naḥman: When a person causes his father and mother suffering, the Holy One, Blessed be He, says: I did well in not dwelling among them, for if I had dwelled among them they would have caused Me suffering as well, as it were. Rabbi Yitzḥak says: Anyone who transgresses in private, it is considered as though he is pushing away the feet of the Divine Presence, i.e., he distances God from him, so to speak. As it is stated: “So says the Lord: The heaven is My throne and the earth is My footstool” (Isaiah 66:1). When someone sins in secret, he demonstrates that he thinks God is absent from that place, and it is as though he pushes His feet away from the earth. With regard to the same issue, Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi says: It is prohibited for a person to walk even four cubits with an upright posture, which is considered an arrogant manner, as it is stated: “The entire world is full of His glory” (Isaiah 6:3). One who walks in an arrogant manner indicates a lack of regard for the glory and honor of God that is surrounding him, and thereby chases God from that place, as it were. The Gemara relates: Rav Huna, son of Rav Yehoshua, would not walk four cubits with an uncovered head. He said: The Divine Presence is above my head, and I must act respectfully.

FYI this is a different Rav Nachman (this one is bar Yaakov)! I guess it was a common name…

Skipping the first sentence, this Rabbi Yitzchak is arguing that one who does wrong, even privately or secretly, is still known to be a wrongdoer by G-d and causes G-d to be distanced from the person. Then Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi adds that one should never walk more than 4 cubits (6 feet) upright, so as to demonstrate humility before G-d. Let it be known Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi is pro-slouching! Then the Gemara adds that Rav Huna ben Yehoshua (no relation) would not walk 4 cubits (presumably from his bed) without covering his head.

Is Rav Huna’s reasoning/motivation for wearing a head covering different from Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak? If different, in what ways?

Now let’s look at the halacha we derived from the reading above:

(ו) אסור לילך בקומה זקופה ולא ילך ד' אמות בגילוי הראש ויבדוק נקביו: הגה ויכסה כל גופו ולא ילך יחף (א"ז) וירגיל עצמו לפנות בוקר וערב שהוא זריזות ונקיות (הגהות מיימוני פ' ה' מה' דעות):

(6) It is forbidden to walk in an [overly] upright posture, and one should not walk [a distance of] four amot with the head uncovered (out of respect for the Divine Presence), and one should examine one's orifices [to ensure they are kept clean]. Rem"a: And one should cover his entire body, and should not go barefoot (Or Zarua). And One should accustom oneself to relieve oneself morning and evening, which is [included in the virtues of] alacrity and cleanliness (Hagahot Maimoni Chap 5 of Hilchot Deot).

So this halacha seems pretty straight-forward and directly derived from the text. But, because straight-forward and simple things are not our way, let’s look at a more stringent commentary on this halacha! Note: this next commentary breaks up each phrase in the line “one should not walk 4 cubits with one’s head uncovered” and comments on each phrase separately, often with many specific examples and citations:

(י) (י) ולא ילך - אפילו בבית שיש בו תקרה וכ"ש תחת אויר השמים דיש ליזהר לכו"ע:

(יא) (יא) ד"א - ומידת חסידות אפילו פחות מד"א ואפילו בעת השינה בלילה ויש שמצדדין לומר דאפילו ד"א אינו אסור מדינא רק להצנועין במעשיהן אבל כבר כתב הט"ז לקמן בסימן ח' דבזמנינו איסור גמור מדינא להיות בגילוי הראש ואפילו יושב בביתו עי"ש הטעם וכן כתב בתשובת מהר"י ברונא וכתב המ"א דאפילו קטנים נכון להרגילם בכיסוי הראש כי היכי דליהוי להו אימתא דשמיא כדאיתא (בשבת קנ"ו) כסי ראשך כי היכי דליהוי עלך אימתא דשמיא ודע עוד דלענין גילוי הראש די בכיסוי היד על הראש וה"ה אם מפלה ראשו שרי בגילוי הראש. ועיין בפמ"ג שכתב דלילך ד"א תחת אויר השמים לא מהני בזה כיסוי הראש ביד:

(יב) (יב) בגילוי הראש - וכ"ש שאסור לברך וה"ה ללמוד בגילוי הראש ולא מהני בזה כיסוי היד דיד וראש חד גופא אינון ואין הגוף יכול לכסות את עצמו ויש מקילין בזה בשעת הדחק כגון בלילה שרוצה לשתות ואין לו כובע בראשו דדי במה שמכסה ראשו בידו אבל יותר טוב לנהוג כמו שהעולם נוהגין שממשיך הבית יד של הבגד על היד ומכסה בו ראשו דאז הוי שפיר כיסוי לכו"ע וכתב הפמ"ג דיש ליזהר בשעת הנחת תפילין של ראש שלא יברך הברכה בראש מגולה ופרו"ק משערות אף אותן שתפורין בבגד מתחתיו יש לאסור מפני מראית העין שיאמרו ששערות הן ויש מקילין:

(10) One should not walk - Even in a house that has a ceiling, and certainly under the open sky, for all opinions agree that one needs to be careful.

(11) 4 cubits - The pious trait is to [not move without a yarmulke] even less than 4 cubits, and [to wear a yarmulke] even when sleeping at night. There are those who lean towards saying that [moving] even 4 cubits [without a yarmulke] isn't prohibited according to [Jewish] law except for [those who are] modest in their ways. However, the Ta"z has already written below in siman 8 that in our time it is entirely prohibited according to [Jewish] law to have one's head uncovered, even when sitting in his house - see there for the reason. And so too writes Mahar"i Bruna. And Magen Avraham writes that even for minors it is correct to habituate them in covering their heads, in order to instill an awe of heaven, as it was brought, (Shabbat 156) "Cover your head so that an awe of heaven will be upon you." And know also that regarding uncovered heads, it is enough to cover one's head with a hand, and similarly, if one is checking their head for lice, it is permitted to not cover one's head. And see further in Pri Megadim who wrote that for moving 4 cubits in the open air, covering one's head with a hand is not sufficient.

(12) With one's head uncovered - And certainly it's forbidden make a blessing. And the same applies to learning Torah with an uncovered head. And for this (ie. making a blessing or learning Torah), it doesn't help to cover [the head] with one's hand, because the hand and head are part of the same body and the body can't cover itself. And there are those who rule leniently regarding this in an extenuating circumstance, for example at night when one wants to drink and he does't have a hat/covering on his head, it's enough for him to cover his head with his hand; but it's better to do like most people do - that they pull the sleeve of their shirt over their hand and then use that to cover their head, for that is certainly considered a head covering according to all opinions. The Pri Megadim wrote that one should be careful when putting on his head tefillin, to not recite the blessing with an uncovered head. A toupee made of hair, even those which have a cloth sewed underneath [the hairs], there are those who forbid it in order to avoid the appearance of transgression, for people will say that that is his [actual] hair; and there are those who are lenient.

Okay, so let’s walk through what we just read:

- This halacha applies not just to walking out in public, but also inside and in your own house.

- There are disagreements on whether one is obligated to cover one’s head while sleeping/sitting or moving less than 4 cubits. The most stringent ruling is to always cover one’s head, even when sleeping. The most lenient says that one is not obligated to cover one’s head, even if they go farther than 4 cubits, unless they are “modest in their ways.”

- The Magen Avraham says we should teach pre-b’nai mitzvah children to wear a kippa so that it will become a habit for them, even though they are not yet obligated (but will be after b’nai mitzvah)

- There are some who rule that one may merely cover their heads with a hand, and others who say that that is only sufficient if moving less than 4 cubits

- One must wear a head covering when making a blessing or studying Torah. In a pinch, if out in public (and eating/drinking) without a hat, one should cover their head with their hand, with their sleeve pulled over their hand if possible.

- One should not lay tefillin without a head covering. Technically, a toupe counts as a head covering, but the more stringent opinion is that one should still wear a hat so as not to appear as though you are transgressing halacha (this concept is called “maarit ayin,” if you want to look it up).

This is a lot of specific rules from that one short line in Talmud! Can you believe how pedantic halacha can be? Isn’t it so fun that we like to build so much off of just one line?

Now, an important clarification: while this is the dominant ruling, it’s not the only interpretation. The Vilna Gaon, a major figure in the 1800s non-Chasidic Ashkenazi world, and the 1800s Sephardic posek (halachic authority) Chaim Yosef David Azulai, both ruled that one is not obligated to cover their head while praying and that this practice is more of an extra, optional virtue.

(ג) יש אומרים שאסור להוציא הזכרה מפיו בראש מגולה וי"א שיש למחות שלא ליכנס בב"ה בגלוי הראש:

(ד) כובעים [קפיל"ה בלעז] הקלועים מקש חשיבא כסוי אבל הנחת יד על הראש לא חשיבא כסוי ואם אחר מניח ידו על ראשו של זה משמע דחשיבא כסוי:

(3) There are those who say that it is forbidden to mention [God's name] with an uncovered head. And there are those who say that one should object that people should not enter the synagogue with an uncovered head.

(4) Hats ("kopilah" in the vernacular) which are woven from straw are considered a covering, but placing one's hand on his head is not considered a covering. And if another [person] places his hand on this one's head, it can be considered covering.

This piece of halacha is saying that some are of the opinion that one should not say G-d’s name (in Hebrew) without covering their head—this appears to be a stringency based on the earlier rule that one must cover their head when saying a blessing/praying. An even more stringent opinion is that one should not only cover their own head, but ensure that all heads are covered in a synagogue, at all times. It also agrees that one’s head should be covered with a material, even if it has gaps (like a woven straw hat), and one’s hand is not sufficient coverage.

I find it interesting that these halachists are attempting to maintain the Toraitic distinction between covering one’s head in prayer and in everyday life, while still supporting the opinions of those who cover their heads at all times. There is not a time in history when all Jews, or all Jewish men, covered their heads outside of prayer. In fact, even among Yeshiva University (Modern Orthodox) folks in the 1950s, some men did not cover their heads. Isn’t it beautiful that Judaism has always had a diversity of opinions and practices?

So, if it’s not obligated, why did wearing a kippa specifically become a dominant practice for Jews?

Wearing A Kippa (Yarmulke) - from DailyHalacha.com

Chacham [wise person] Ovadia Yosef, in a famous responsum, noted that wearing a Kippa nowadays serves as a symbol of one's affiliation with the observant Jewish community, and one should therefore make a point of wearing a Kippa at all times, except, of course, when he bathes and the like. According to the teachings of Kabbala, one should wear a Kippa even while he sleeps.

It is therefore proper to wear a Kippa at all times, both in and out of the home, particularly in light of the fact that we generally live in safe neighborhoods where there is no immediate threat of anti-Semitic hostility...

...How large a Kippa must one wear?

Chacham Ovadia Yosef rules that one should preferably wear a Kippa that covers the majority of his head. At very least, he adds, one's Kippa should be large enough to be seen from all sides.

This excerpt from DailyHalacha.com establishes a few basic guidelines for us:

- Why wear a kippa, if it is not halachically necessary? Because it serves as a form of identity flagging, so that other people will know you are an "observant Jew," by whatever definition resonates with you. An important halachic precept to consider with this is the concept of ma'arit ayin, that one should not do things that might confuse or deceive others, even if it's technically kosher. Do you think it would be ma'arit ayin for a non-observant or non-religious Jew to wear a kippa everyday? Are there different types of kippot that would resolve this? Is ma'arit ayin referring to confusion/deception of other Jews, or does it matter what non-Jews think as well?

Another reason is that, in line with the Ta"z (David HaLevi Segal, 16th-17th century Polish commentator)'s interpretation, we are forbidden to follow the customs of non-Jews [see Deut 12:30, Levit 18:1-3]. Since non-Jews stopped wearing head coverings, we should go against the grain and distinguish ourselves by covering our heads.

- What size should it be? Big enough to cover the majority of your head, or at least big enough that one can see you are wearing one from any angle. Interesting that most kippot are not this big!

- When is it okay not to publicly wear a kippa? This text seems to implicitly state that one is not obligated to wear a kippa in public if it would be reasonable to expect antisemitic hostility.

.

So far, we’ve really just looked at the history of the kippa/yarmulke (as is the titular focus point of this sheet), which has traditionally been a masculine head covering. But Jewish women also have a history of head coverings (in addition to the many Jewish women in modern times who wear kippot!) What do the texts say about women covering their heads?

(יח) וְהֶעֱמִ֨יד הַכֹּהֵ֥ן אֶֽת־הָאִשָּׁה֮ לִפְנֵ֣י ה' וּפָרַע֙ אֶת־רֹ֣אשׁ הָֽאִשָּׁ֔ה וְנָתַ֣ן עַל־כַּפֶּ֗יהָ אֵ֚ת מִנְחַ֣ת הַזִּכָּר֔וֹן מִנְחַ֥ת קְנָאֹ֖ת הִ֑וא וּבְיַ֤ד הַכֹּהֵן֙ יִהְי֔וּ מֵ֥י הַמָּרִ֖ים הַמְאָֽרְרִֽים׃

(18) After he has made the woman* Lit. ["the (womanly) participant whose involvement defines the depicted situation," namely the ritual proceeding. Labeling her as “woman” in this passage means that she is construed mainly as a party to the proceeding, rather than as her husband’s wife] stand before ה', the priest shall bare the woman’s head* [Or “dishevel the woman’s hair”] and place upon her hands the meal offering of remembrance, which is a meal offering of jealousy. And in the priest’s hands shall be the water of bitterness that *induces the spell.* meaning uncertain.

So this excerpt is from the explanation of a ritual in which a man, if he suspects his wife has had relations with another man, takes her before a priest to be part of this ritual. The priest uncovers her hair (implying her hair is usually covered) and makes her drink a special bitter water which will either kill her, supposedly if she's guilty, or will not kill her and prove her innocence. A pretty intense punishment for cheating!

This is the earliest example in our texts of a Jewish woman's head covering. But what does Jewish law say about women covering their heads?

אָמַר רַב חִסְדָּא: שׁוֹק בָּאִשָּׁה עֶרְוָה, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״גַּלִּי שׁוֹק עִבְרִי נְהָרוֹת״, וּכְתִיב: ״תִּגָּל עֶרְוָתֵךְ וְגַם תֵּרָאֶה חֶרְפָּתֵךְ״. אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: קוֹל בָּאִשָּׁה — עֶרְוָה, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״כִּי קוֹלֵךְ עָרֵב וּמַרְאֵךְ נָאוֶה״. אָמַר רַב שֵׁשֶׁת: שֵׂעָר בָּאִשָּׁה עֶרְוָה, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״שַׂעֲרֵךְ כְּעֵדֶר הָעִזִּים״.
Along these lines, Rav Ḥisda said: Even a woman’s exposed leg is considered nakedness, as it is stated: “Uncover the leg and pass through the rivers” (Isaiah 47:2), and it is written in the following verse: “Your nakedness shall be revealed and your shame shall be seen” (Isaiah 47:3). Shmuel further stated: A woman’s singing voice is considered nakedness, which he derives from the praise accorded a woman’s voice, as it is stated: “Sweet is your voice and your countenance is alluring” (Song of Songs 2:14). Similarly, Rav Sheshet stated: Even a woman’s hair is considered nakedness, for it too is praised, as it is written: “Your hair is like a flock of goats, trailing down from Mount Gilead” (Song of Songs 4:1).

So, in this text, the rabbis are discussing what is considered “ervah,” translated here as “nakedness”—the word is actually related to the word “eruv,” the boundary around a private domain, such as a house’s fence or an unbroken length of wire wrapped around the exterior boundaries of a Jewish neighborhood. Based on this word connection, we might understand “ervah” to mean “something that should only be within a private domain, among members of your household (such as your spouse or children).” The rabbis determine that, among other things, a woman’s hair is ervah. But how should a woman cover her hair?

וְאֵיזוֹהִי דָּת יְהוּדִית? יוֹצְאָה וְרֹאשָׁהּ פָּרוּעַ. רֹאשָׁהּ פָּרוּעַ דְּאוֹרָיְיתָא הִיא, דִּכְתִיב: ״וּפָרַע אֶת רֹאשׁ הָאִשָּׁה״, וְתָנָא דְּבֵי רַבִּי יִשְׁמָעֵאל: אַזְהָרָה לִבְנוֹת יִשְׂרָאֵל שֶׁלֹּא יֵצְאוּ בִּפְרוּעַ רֹאשׁ! דְּאוֹרָיְיתָא — קַלְתָּהּ שַׁפִּיר דָּמֵי, דָּת יְהוּדִית — אֲפִילּוּ קַלְתָּהּ נָמֵי אָסוּר.

The mishna stated: And who is considered a woman who violates the precepts of Jewish women? One who goes out and her head is uncovered. The Gemara asks: The prohibition against a woman going out with her head uncovered is not merely a custom of Jewish women. Rather, it is by Torah law, as it is written with regard to a woman suspected by her husband of having been unfaithful: “And he shall uncover the head of the woman” (Numbers 5:18). And the school of Rabbi Yishmael taught: From here there is a warning to Jewish women not to go out with an uncovered head, since if the Torah states that a woman suspected of adultery must have her head uncovered, this indicates that a married woman must generally cover her head. The Gemara explains: By Torah law,

Ketubot 72b

if she covers her head with her basket [kilta], it seems well and is sufficient. But by precepts of Jewish women, i.e., custom, even if her head is covered by her basket this is also prohibited; she requires a substantial head covering.

This Talmud excerpt explains that a woman should cover her hair, and that this is not just a common custom but argues that it is a Torah law based on the first line we looked at. Do you think this is a solid argument?

Then Rabbi Yishmael says that any married woman who goes out with her hair uncovered is thought to be having an affair—does this mean unmarried women did not cover their hair? Or that all the modest women covered, but “promiscuous” women did not?

Finally, the rabbis note that there are different customs on what is considered sufficient hair coverage.

(א) להזהר מגלוי שער וקול אשה בשעת ק"ש וכן שלא לקרותה כנגד הערוה. ובו ו סעיפים:
טפח מגולה באשה במקום שדרכה לכסותו אפי' היא אשתו אסו' לקרות ק"ש כנגדה: הגה וי"א דוקא באשתו אבל באשה אחרת אפי' פחות מטפח הוה ערוה (הגהות מיימוני פרק ג') ויראה מדברי הרא"ש דטפח באשה ערוה אפילו לאשה אחרת רק שבעצמה יכולה לקרות אע"פ שהיא ערומה כדלעיל סי' ע"ד:

(ב) שער של אשה שדרכה לכסות אסו' לקרות כנגדו: הגה (אפי' אשתו) אבל בתולות שדרכן לילך פרועות הראש מות': הגה וה"ה השערות של נשים שרגילין לצאת מחוץ לצמתן (ב"י בשם הרשב"א) וכ"ש שער נכרית אפי' דרכה לכסות (הגהות אלפסי החדשים):

(1) To Be Careful of Exposed Hair and the Voice of a Woman at the Time of the Recitation of the Sh'ma and So Not to Recite It in Front of the Nakedness - Containing 6 S'ifim
If a handbreadth is uncovered on a woman in a place [on her body] where the practice (lit. way) is to cover it, even if it his wife, then it is forbidden to recite the Recitation of the Sh'ma in front of her. Rem"a: And there are those who say that this is specifically with respect to his wife, but with another woman even less than a handbreadth is [considered] nakedness (Hagahot Maimoni Chapter 3). And it seems from the words of the Rosh that a handbreadth on a woman is [considered] nakedness even [in regards] to another woman, except that to herself she is able to recite [the Recitation of the Sh'ma] even though she is naked like was said earlier in Siman 74.

(2) The hair of a woman that it is the practice (lit. way) to cover is forbidden to recite [the Recitation of the Sh'ma] in front of it. Rem"a: Even his wife. But unmarried women for whom it is their way to go with an uncovered head, it is permitted. Rem"a: And so too is the law with the hairs of women that regularly come out of their covering (Beit Yosef in the name of Rashba) and certainly foreign hair (i.e. a wig) even if it is her practice to cover (Hagahot Alfasi haChadashim).

So now, finally, we establish that, actually, this head covering thing is only a requirement for married women, and not all women.

This piece of halacha is discussing whether it is kosher for a man to say the Shema prayer in the same room as a woman whose hair is uncovered. One opinion is that even a little bit of woman’s hair showing means a man should not say the Shema, though a little more hair uncovered might be permissible if it’s his own wife. Another opinion says that even another woman should not say the Shema in the presence of a woman with her hair uncovered. Still another opinion says that this rule does not apply to unmarried women, since their hair is not considered private/nakedness yet. Finally, two more opinions are brought on married women who cover their hair inconsistently and who wear wigs/sheitels—the opinion is that, at least during the chanting of the Shema, they must cover their hair.

.

So, we’ve now established men’s and women’s head coverings. Unfortunately, our texts are very gender-binary. However, if you are nonbinary or gender-nonconforming, I think that the best way to decide what is right for you is to start with what halachot are the same for all genders, and then explore what kinds of more historically-gender-affiliated head covering practices feel right for you!

Can wearing a kippa or headscarf affirm your gender identity and expression in Jewish spaces? Does covering your head make you feel more spiritually tuned-in? Is there a kind of fun hat, head band, or wig that would fulfill the requirements for covering your head during prayer without feeling like you are misgendering yourself?