
(ב) וַיָּבֹ֥אוּ בְנֵֽי־גָ֖ד וּבְנֵ֣י רְאוּבֵ֑ן וַיֹּאמְר֤וּ אֶל־מֹשֶׁה֙ וְאֶל־אֶלְעָזָ֣ר הַכֹּהֵ֔ן וְאֶל־נְשִׂיאֵ֥י הָעֵדָ֖ה לֵאמֹֽר׃ ... (ד) הָאָ֗רֶץ אֲשֶׁ֨ר הִכָּ֤ה יקוק לִפְנֵי֙ עֲדַ֣ת יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל אֶ֥רֶץ מִקְנֶ֖ה הִ֑וא וְלַֽעֲבָדֶ֖יךָ מִקְנֶֽה׃ {ס} (ה) וַיֹּאמְר֗וּ אִם־מָצָ֤אנוּ חֵן֙ בְּעֵינֶ֔יךָ יֻתַּ֞ן אֶת־הָאָ֧רֶץ הַזֹּ֛את לַעֲבָדֶ֖יךָ לַאֲחֻזָּ֑ה אַל־תַּעֲבִרֵ֖נוּ אֶת־הַיַּרְדֵּֽן׃
(2) the Gadite and Reubenite [leaders] came to Moses, Eleazar the priest, and the chieftains of the community, and said, ... (4) the land that יקוק has conquered for the community of Israel—is cattle country, and your servants have cattle. (5) It would be a favor to us,” they continued, “if this land were given to your servants as a holding; do not move us across the Jordan.”
1. Are Gad and Reuven lazy? scared? Do they care about the other tribes? What is their motivation? Is this a reasonable request? Why/why not?
(ו) וַיֹּ֣אמֶר מֹשֶׁ֔ה לִבְנֵי־גָ֖ד וְלִבְנֵ֣י רְאוּבֵ֑ן הַאַֽחֵיכֶ֗ם יָבֹ֙אוּ֙ לַמִּלְחָמָ֔ה וְאַתֶּ֖ם תֵּ֥שְׁבוּ פֹֽה׃ (ז) וְלָ֣מָּה (תנואון) [תְנִיא֔וּן] אֶת־לֵ֖ב בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵ֑ל מֵֽעֲבֹר֙ אֶל־הָאָ֔רֶץ אֲשֶׁר־נָתַ֥ן לָהֶ֖ם יקוק׃ (ח) כֹּ֥ה עָשׂ֖וּ אֲבֹתֵיכֶ֑ם בְּשׇׁלְחִ֥י אֹתָ֛ם מִקָּדֵ֥שׁ בַּרְנֵ֖עַ לִרְא֥וֹת אֶת־הָאָֽרֶץ׃ (ט) וַֽיַּעֲל֞וּ עַד־נַ֣חַל אֶשְׁכּ֗וֹל וַיִּרְאוּ֙ אֶת־הָאָ֔רֶץ וַיָּנִ֕יאוּ אֶת־לֵ֖ב בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵ֑ל לְבִלְתִּי־בֹא֙ אֶל־הָאָ֔רֶץ אֲשֶׁר־נָתַ֥ן לָהֶ֖ם יקוק׃
1. What is Moshe's motivation? Is this a reasonable response to Gad and Reuven? Why/why not?
במדבר רבה ז'
מִכָּאן נָתְנוּ חֲכָמִים מְחִצּוֹת וְאָמְרוּ (משנה כלים א-ו): עֶשֶׂר קְדֻשּׁוֹת הֵן: אֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל מְקֻדֶּשֶׁת מִכָּל הָאֲרָצוֹת, וּמָה הִיא קְדֻשָּׁתָהּ שֶׁמְבִיאִין מִמֶּנָּהּ הָעֹמֶר וְהַבִּכּוּרִים וּשְׁתֵּי הַלֶּחֶם, מַה שֶּׁאֵין כֵּן בְּכָל הָאֲרָצוֹת. אֶרֶץ כְּנַעַן מְקֻדֶּשֶׁת מֵעֵבֶר הַיַּרְדֵּן, אֶרֶץ כְּנַעַן כְּשֵׁרָה לְבֵית שְׁכִינָה וְאֵין עֵבֶר הַיַּרְדֵּן כָּשֵׁר לְבֵית שְׁכִינָה.
Bamidbar Rabbah 7
From here the Sages instituted partitions: There are ten sanctities: The Land of Israel is more sacred than all the lands. How is its sanctity manifest? It is, that one brings the omer, first fruits, and two loaves from it, which is not so regarding all the lands. The land of Canaan is more sacred than the east bank of the Jordan. The land of Canaan is fit to serve as an abode for the Divine Presence, and the east bank of the Jordan is not fit to serve as an abode for the Divine Presence.
(ב) גם נתכוון במאמר תשבו פה בטענה הנשמעת כי ארץ סיחון ועוג שהם שואלים נתנה יקוק כשהיו מקובצים יחד שבטי ישראל שזכות כלן עמד להנחילם הארץ הלזו וכשהם נוטלים חלקם בארץ נגרע מערך זכות הרבים לפי שהם יושבים פה, ובזה סתר טענתם שנתכוונו במאמר אשר הכה יקוק שזה יגיד על מלחמות הארץ שאין טורח לישראל כמו שפירשתי למעלה כי לא כן הוא שאין הדבר דומה:
(2) Another aspect which Moses alluded to when he asked: "are you going to sit here?" (while the conquest of the west bank will take place), was the fact that when these lands of Sichon and Og were conquered all the tribes were present, and their combined merit helped to ensure that G'd did all the fighting. If they were now going to remain behind, only ten tribes would cross the Jordan and their combined merit would be smaller, possibly with the result that also G'd's input into the battle would be smaller. ...
(א) ויאמר משה וגו' האחיכם יבואו וגו' ולמה תניאון וגו'. ... והוא מה שדייק יבואו למלחמה ולא אמר האחיכם ילחמו לומר שעל הביאה בלבד הוא תמה, ויש בזה סתירה על טענת מלחמה שעברה וגם טענת מלחמה הבאה בארץ שעל כל פנים כל איש ישראל יש להם יגיעה בדבר, ולמה יבקשו הם יגיע כפם של ישראל, וגמר אומר ואתם תשבו פה, נתחכם לומר שהגם שהבטחת יקוק היא מושגת שאמירת הגבוה כמסירת הדיוט ואין כאן יגיעה, הלא תשכיל ביאת ישראל למלחמה בערך ישיבתכם פה ותראו כי יש הרגש ליגיעת ביאת המלחמה, ואם כן למה תרצו ליטול דבר שהיא יגיעה של ישראל כיון שאין אתם יגיעים עמהם בביאתכם למלחמת הארץ:
(1) ויאמר משה…האחיכם יבואו למלחמה…ולמה תניאון, ... He did not say האחיכם ילחמו, "are your brethren to do battle?," but he said האחיכם יבאו למלחמה, "are your brethren going to be present in order to do battle?" He could not understand that these two tribes were not willing to be present at the time when the Israelites would conquer the west bank. Moses accused the two tribes of contradicting themselves as they were well aware that even though G'd had done the fighting which resulted in the conquest of the lands of Sichon and Og, nonetheless it had involved the soldiers in great fatigue. The same would occur in the future. By what right did they think they could shirk their duty to undergo this fatigue also? They were behaving like parasites collecting the reward for the fatigue suffered by the other tribes. This is why he asked them: ואתם תשבו פה? "and you are going to sit here?
1. Why is Moshe so concerned with the psychological impact of the request of Gad and Reuven? What is really on his mind?
(כז) וַיְסַפְּרוּ־לוֹ֙ וַיֹּ֣אמְר֔וּ בָּ֕אנוּ אֶל־הָאָ֖רֶץ אֲשֶׁ֣ר שְׁלַחְתָּ֑נוּ וְ֠גַ֠ם זָבַ֨ת חָלָ֥ב וּדְבַ֛שׁ הִ֖וא וְזֶה־פִּרְיָֽהּ׃ (כח) אֶ֚פֶס כִּֽי־עַ֣ז הָעָ֔ם הַיֹּשֵׁ֖ב בָּאָ֑רֶץ וְהֶֽעָרִ֗ים בְּצֻר֤וֹת גְּדֹלֹת֙ מְאֹ֔ד וְגַם־יְלִדֵ֥י הָֽעֲנָ֖ק רָאִ֥ינוּ שָֽׁם׃ ... אָֽמְר֔וּ לֹ֥א נוּכַ֖ל לַעֲל֣וֹת אֶל־הָעָ֑ם כִּֽי־חָזָ֥ק ה֖וּא מִמֶּֽנּוּ׃ (לב) וַיֹּצִ֜יאוּ דִּבַּ֤ת הָאָ֙רֶץ֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר תָּר֣וּ אֹתָ֔הּ אֶל־בְּנֵ֥י יִשְׂרָאֵ֖ל לֵאמֹ֑ר הָאָ֡רֶץ אֲשֶׁר֩ עָבַ֨רְנוּ בָ֜הּ לָת֣וּר אֹתָ֗הּ אֶ֣רֶץ אֹכֶ֤לֶת יוֹשְׁבֶ֙יהָ֙ הִ֔וא וְכׇל־הָעָ֛ם אֲשֶׁר־רָאִ֥ינוּ בְתוֹכָ֖הּ אַנְשֵׁ֥י מִדּֽוֹת׃ (לג) וְשָׁ֣ם רָאִ֗ינוּ אֶת־הַנְּפִילִ֛ים בְּנֵ֥י עֲנָ֖ק מִן־הַנְּפִלִ֑ים וַנְּהִ֤י בְעֵינֵ֙ינוּ֙ כַּֽחֲגָבִ֔ים וְכֵ֥ן הָיִ֖ינוּ בְּעֵינֵיהֶֽם׃
(27) This is what they told him: “We came to the land you sent us to; it does indeed flow with milk and honey, and this is its fruit. (28) However, the people who inhabit the country are powerful, and the cities are fortified and very large; moreover, we saw the Anakites there. ... “We cannot attack that people, for it is stronger than we.” (32) Thus they spread calumnies among the Israelites about the land they had scouted, saying, “The country that we traversed and scouted is one that devours its settlers. All the people that we saw in it are of great size; (33) we saw the Nephilim there—the Anakites are part of the Nephilim—and we looked like grasshoppers to ourselves, and so we must have looked to them.”
1. To what extent do we need to understand other people's motivations when listening to what they are saying?
2. To what extent can past trauma affect our and others' decision-making?
3. To what extent should we allow others' perception of an event or how others may react to affect our decision-making processes?
4. What should we do?
(17) And we will hasten as shock-troops in the van of the Israelites until we have established them in their home, while our children stay in the fortified towns because of the inhabitants of the land. (18) We will not return to our homes until the Israelites—every one of them—are in possession of their portion. (19) But we will not have a share with them in the territory beyond the Jordan, for we have received our share on the east side of the Jordan.”
1. Is this a good solution to the issue? Are there any problems which might arise? How might these be resolved?
... (ט) וַיָּשֻׁ֣בוּ וַיֵּלְכ֡וּ בְּנֵֽי־רְאוּבֵ֨ן וּבְנֵי־גָ֜ד וַחֲצִ֣י ׀ שֵׁ֣בֶט הַֽמְנַשֶּׁ֗ה מֵאֵת֙ בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל מִשִּׁלֹ֖ה אֲשֶׁ֣ר בְּאֶֽרֶץ־כְּנָ֑עַן לָלֶ֜כֶת אֶל־אֶ֣רֶץ הַגִּלְעָ֗ד אֶל־אֶ֤רֶץ אֲחֻזָּתָם֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר נֹֽאחֲזוּ־בָ֔הּ עַל־פִּ֥י יקוק בְּיַד־מֹשֶֽׁה׃ (י) וַיָּבֹ֙אוּ֙ אֶל־גְּלִיל֣וֹת הַיַּרְדֵּ֔ן אֲשֶׁ֖ר בְּאֶ֣רֶץ כְּנָ֑עַן וַיִּבְנ֣וּ בְנֵי־רְאוּבֵ֣ן וּבְנֵי־גָ֡ד וַחֲצִ֣י שֵׁ֩בֶט֩ הַֽמְנַשֶּׁ֨ה שָׁ֤ם מִזְבֵּ֙חַ֙ עַל־הַיַּרְדֵּ֔ן מִזְבֵּ֥חַ גָּד֖וֹל לְמַרְאֶֽה׃ ... (יז) הַמְעַט־לָ֙נוּ֙ אֶת־עֲוֺ֣ן פְּע֔וֹר אֲשֶׁ֤ר לֹא־הִטַּהַ֙רְנוּ֙ מִמֶּ֔נּוּ עַ֖ד הַיּ֣וֹם הַזֶּ֑ה וַיְהִ֥י הַנֶּ֖גֶף בַּעֲדַ֥ת יקוק׃ ... (יט) וְאַ֨ךְ אִם־טְמֵאָ֜ה אֶ֣רֶץ אֲחֻזַּתְכֶ֗ם עִבְר֨וּ לָכֶ֜ם אֶל־אֶ֨רֶץ אֲחֻזַּ֤ת יקוק אֲשֶׁ֤ר שָֽׁכַן־שָׁם֙ מִשְׁכַּ֣ן יקוק וְהֵאָחֲז֖וּ בְּתוֹכֵ֑נוּ וּבַיקוק אַל־תִּמְרֹ֗דוּ וְאֹתָ֙נוּ֙ אַל־תִּמְרֹ֔דוּ בִּבְנֹתְכֶ֤ם לָכֶם֙ מִזְבֵּ֔חַ מִֽבַּלְעֲדֵ֔י מִזְבַּ֖ח יקוק אֱלֹקֵֽינוּ׃ ...
... (9) So the Reubenites, the Gadites, and the half-tribe of Manasseh left the Israelites at Shiloh, in the land of Canaan, and made their way back to the land of Gilead, the land of their own holding, which they had acquired by GOD’s command through Moses. (10) When they came to the region of the Jordan in the land of Canaan, the Reubenites and the Gadites and the half-tribe of Manasseh built an altar there by the Jordan, a great conspicuous altar. ... (17) Is the sin of Peor, which brought a plague upon GOD’s community, such a small thing to us? We have not purified ourselves from it to this very day; ... ... (19) If it is because the land of your holding is impure, cross over into the land of GOD’s own holding, where the Tabernacle of GOD abides, and acquire holdings among us. But do not rebel against GOD, and do not rebel against us by building for yourselves an altar other than the altar of the ETERNAL our God. ...
In Blow to Netanyahu's Government, Israel's Top Court Rules State Must Draft ultra-Orthodox Into IDF: Israel's High Court ruled unanimously on Tuesday that ultra-Orthodox Israelis must be drafted into the Israeli army and that yeshivas should not receive government funding if their students do not enlist... The ruling of the extended panel of nine High Court justices, ... , stated that "In the midst of a grueling war, the burden of inequality is starker than ever and demands a response." The justices noted in their ruling that when many soldiers are sacrificing their lives, "Discrimination regarding the most precious thing of all – life itself – is of the worst kind." The justices further stated that "Currently, there is no law that clearly distinguishes between yeshiva students and other candidates for military service. Accordingly, the state does not have the authority to order a broad exemption [of ultra-Orthodox citizens] from army conscription, and it must act in accordance with the provisions of the Israeli Defense Service Law." The ruling determined that in the absence of a suitable legal framework, yeshivas whose students have not enlisted despite not receiving an exemption from military service or a formal postponement, must no longer receive government funding. The justices noted that the court determined seven years ago that the Israeli Defense Service Law, which grants yeshiva students the option of postponing military service until being granted a full exemption, is unconstitutional due to its severe violation of the right to equality. ... (https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2024-06-25/ty-article/.premium/in-blow-to-netanyahu-israels-top-court-says-state-must-draft-ultra-orthodox-to-army/)