Save "Artificial Intelligence and The Future of The Rabbinate
"
Artificial Intelligence and The Future of The Rabbinate
(ב) לֹֽא־תִהְיֶ֥ה אַחֲרֵֽי־רַבִּ֖ים לְרָעֹ֑ת וְלֹא־תַעֲנֶ֣ה עַל־רִ֗ב לִנְטֹ֛ת אַחֲרֵ֥י רַבִּ֖ים לְהַטֹּֽת׃
(2) You shall neither side with the mighty to do wrong—you shall not give perverse testimony in a dispute so as to pervert it in favor of the mighty

(ז) לֹא מִקְרֵי הוֹרָאָה אֶלָּא כְּשֶׁמּוֹרֶה עַל מַעֲשֶׂה שֶׁבָּא לְפָנָיו, אֲבָל אִם שָׁאֲלוּ לְתַלְמִיד הֲלָכָה כְּדִבְרֵי מִי, יָכוֹל לוֹמַר מַה שֶּׁבְּדַעְתּוֹ, כֵּיוָן שֶׁאֵינוֹ מוֹרֶה עַל מַעֲשֶׂה שֶׁבָּא לְפָנָיו.

It is not called 'Horah' unless one is deciding the status of a specific incident that came before him. However, if one is asked a theoretical question of law, such as " who do we follow" this is permitted for him to decide....

(ח) לֹא מִקְרֵי הוֹרָאָה אֶלָּא בְּדָבָר שֶׁיֵּשׁ בּוֹ חִדּוּשׁ לַשּׁוֹאֵל, אֲבָל בְּהוֹרָאָה יְדוּעָה שֶׁהִיא פְּשׁוּטָה לַכֹּל, כְּגוֹן נוֹתֵן טַעַם לִפְגָם אוֹ לְבַטֵּל אִסוּר בְּשִׁשִּׁים וְכַיּוֹצֵא בָּאֵלּוּ, מֻתָּר.

"Horah" is only when one decides something that is new to the one asking. However, if one is just using well-known laws and applying them to an obvious situation, this is not Horah.

(ט) יֵשׁ מִי שֶׁכָּתַב, שֶׁכָּל הַכָּתוּב בַּסְפָרִים מִפִּסְקֵי הַגְּאוֹנִים יָכוֹל לְהוֹרוֹת בִּימֵי רַבּוֹ, רַק לֹא יוֹרֶה דָּבָר מִלִּבּוֹ וְלֹא יִסְמֹךְ עַל רְאָיוֹתָיו לְדַמּוֹת מִלְּתָא לְמִלְּתָא מֵעַצְמוֹ.

There are those that say that is one is using books of previous great sages as a source ( meaning the exact case was found there and he is merely quoting their opinion) one can do that during the life of his master. However, one should not make comparisions between two disparate cases.

(ח) כִּ֣י יִפָּלֵא֩ מִמְּךָ֨ דָבָ֜ר לַמִּשְׁפָּ֗ט בֵּֽין־דָּ֨ם ׀ לְדָ֜ם בֵּֽין־דִּ֣ין לְדִ֗ין וּבֵ֥ין נֶ֙גַע֙ לָנֶ֔גַע דִּבְרֵ֥י רִיבֹ֖ת בִּשְׁעָרֶ֑יךָ וְקַמְתָּ֣ וְעָלִ֔יתָ אֶל־הַמָּק֔וֹם אֲשֶׁ֥ר יִבְחַ֛ר יְהוָ֥ה אֱלֹהֶ֖יךָ בּֽוֹ׃
(8) If a case is too baffling for you to decide, be it a controversy over homicide, civil law, or assault—matters of dispute in your courts—you shall promptly repair to the place that the LORD your God will have chosen,
(ט) וּבָאתָ֗ אֶל־הַכֹּהֲנִים֙ הַלְוִיִּ֔ם וְאֶל־הַשֹּׁפֵ֔ט אֲשֶׁ֥ר יִהְיֶ֖ה בַּיָּמִ֣ים הָהֵ֑ם וְדָרַשְׁתָּ֙ וְהִגִּ֣ידוּ לְךָ֔ אֵ֖ת דְּבַ֥ר הַמִּשְׁפָּֽט׃
(9) and appear before the levitical priests, or the magistrate in charge at the time, and present your problem. When they have announced to you the verdict in the case,
(י) וְעָשִׂ֗יתָ עַל־פִּ֤י הַדָּבָר֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר יַגִּ֣ידֽוּ לְךָ֔ מִן־הַמָּק֣וֹם הַה֔וּא אֲשֶׁ֖ר יִבְחַ֣ר יְהוָ֑ה וְשָׁמַרְתָּ֣ לַעֲשׂ֔וֹת כְּכֹ֖ל אֲשֶׁ֥ר יוֹרֽוּךָ׃
(10) you shall carry out the verdict that is announced to you from that place that the LORD chose, observing scrupulously all their instructions to you.
(יא) עַל־פִּ֨י הַתּוֹרָ֜ה אֲשֶׁ֣ר יוֹר֗וּךָ וְעַל־הַמִּשְׁפָּ֛ט אֲשֶׁר־יֹאמְר֥וּ לְךָ֖ תַּעֲשֶׂ֑ה לֹ֣א תָס֗וּר מִן־הַדָּבָ֛ר אֲשֶׁר־יַגִּ֥ידֽוּ לְךָ֖ יָמִ֥ין וּשְׂמֹֽאל׃
(11) You shall act in accordance with the instructions given you and the ruling handed down to you; you must not deviate from the verdict that they announce to you either to the right or to the left.
ולרבה דאמר לפי שאין בקיאין לשמה ליבעי תרי מידי דהוה אכל עדיות שבתורה עד אחד נאמן באיסורין
The Gemara asks: And according to the opinion of Rabba, who said that the reason is because they are not experts in writing a bill of divorce for her sake, let us require two witnesses to testify about this, just as is the case with regard to all testimonies in the Torah. The Gemara answers: One witness is deemed credible with regard to prohibitions. In other words, if there is uncertainty as to whether a matter is prohibited or permitted, in the case of the heretofore married woman, the testimony of one witnesses is sufficient.
אימור דאמרינן עד אחד נאמן באיסורין כגון חתיכה ספק של חלב ספק של שומן דלא איתחזק איסורא
The Gemara asks: One can say that we say one witness is deemed credible with regard to prohibitions in a case such as where there is a piece of fat, and it is uncertain if it is forbidden fat [ḥelev] and uncertain if it is permitted fat. In this situation the piece can be rendered permitted by a single witness, as there is no presumption that it is forbidden. Therefore, as there is an uncertainty, and one witness said it is permitted fat, he is deemed credible.
We use cookies to give you the best experience possible on our site. Click OK to continue using Sefaria. Learn More.OKאנחנו משתמשים ב"עוגיות" כדי לתת למשתמשים את חוויית השימוש הטובה ביותר.קראו עוד בנושאלחצו כאן לאישור