Companionship or Death: Stories of Relationships in the Talmud
כי הא דרב רחומי
הוה שכיח קמיה דרבא במחוזא
הוה רגיל דהוה אתי לביתיה
כל מעלי יומא דכיפורי.
יומא חד משכתיה שמעתא.
הוה מסכיא דביתהו:
״השתא אתי, השתא אתי״.
לא אתא.
חלש דעתה אחית דמעתא מעינה
הוה יתיב באיגרא
אפחית איגרא מתותיה
ונח נפשיה.
It was told about Rav Reḥumi, who would commonly study before Rava in Meḥoza:
He was accustomed to come back to his home every year on the eve of Yom Kippur.
One day he was particularly engrossed in the learning, and so he remained in the study hall and did not go home.
His wife was expecting him and continually said to herself:
Now he is coming, now he is coming.
He did not come.
She was distressed.
A tear fell from her eye.
At that exact moment, Rav Reḥumi was sitting on the roof.
The roof collapsed under him
and he died.
-
Read the story and divide it into scenes.
-
Ask as many questions as possible about the story. For example: Why would Rav Rehumei come back every year?
-
Identify the important characters in this drama. How do you imagine each one of them?
-
Why would Rav Rehumei return specifically on the Eve of Yom Kippur?
-
"The Torah pulled him" – What is the image of Torah learning that arises from this metaphor? See also Bavli Eruvin 54b
-
"A tear flowed from her eye" – see Bavli Baba Metzia 59a. What does this add to your understanding of the role of Rav Rehumei's wife in the story?
-
"He was sitting on a roof" – what does this location/metaphor add? See also Dvarim 22:8.
-
What is this story trying to tell us? Why was this story told?
Her deceit is at hand - the presence of her tear quickly brings calamitous retribution for the deceit.
The Context: The Background Mishna and Two Additional Stories
MISHNA: With regard to one who vows that his wife may not derive benefit from marital relations with him, Beit Shammai say: He may maintain this situation for up to two weeks, but beyond that he must divorce her and give her the payment for her marriage contract. Beit Hillel say: He must divorce her if it continues beyond one week. Apropos the husband’s obligation to his wife regarding marital relations, the Gemara mentions other aspects of this issue: Students may leave their homes and travel in order to learn Torah without their wives’ permission for up to thirty days, and laborers may leave their homes without their wives’ permission for up to one week. The set interval defining the frequency of a husband’s conjugal obligation to his wife stated in the Torah (see Exodus 21:10), unless the couple stipulated otherwise, varies according to the man’s occupation and proximity to his home: Men of leisure, who do not work, must engage in marital relations every day, laborers must do so twice a week, donkey drivers once a week, camel drivers once every thirty days, and sailors once every six months. This is the statement of Rabbi Eliezer.
§ The mishna stated: For sailors, the set interval for conjugal relations is once every six months. This is the statement of Rabbi Eliezer. Rav Berona said that Rav said: The halakha is in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Eliezer. Rav Adda bar Ahava said that Rav said: This is the statement of Rabbi Eliezer, but the Rabbis say: Students may leave their homes to study Torah for as long as two or three years without permission from their wives. Rava said: The Sages relied on Rabbi Adda bar Ahava’s opinion and performed an action like this themselves, but the results were sometimes fatal. This is as it is related about Rav Reḥumi, who would commonly study before Rava in Meḥoza: He was accustomed to come back to his home every year on the eve of Yom Kippur. One day he was particularly engrossed in the halakha he was studying, and so he remained in the study hall and did not go home. His wife was expecting him that day and continually said to herself: Now he is coming, now he is coming. But in the end, he did not come. She was distressed by this and a tear fell from her eye. At that exact moment, Rav Reḥumi was sitting on the roof. The roof collapsed under him and he died. This teaches how much one must be careful, as he was punished severely for causing anguish to his wife, even inadvertently.
Overturn his bed– As is done during mourning, when the mourners must overturn their beds.
It is related further that Yehuda, son of Rabbi Ḥiyya and son-in-law of Rabbi Yannai, would go and sit in the study hall, and every Shabbat eve at twilight he would come to his house. When he would come, Rabbi Yannai would see a pillar of fire preceding him due to his sanctity. One day he was engrossed in the halakha he was studying, and he stayed in the study hall and did not return home. When Rabbi Yannai did not see that sign preceding him, he said to the family: Turn his bed over, as one does at times of mourning, since he must have died, reasoning that if Yehuda were alive he would not have missed his set interval for conjugal relations and would certainly have come home. What he said became “like an error that proceeds from a ruler” (Ecclesiastes 10:5), and Yehuda, son of Rabbi Ḥiyya, died.
-
Read the story and divide it into scenes.
-
Ask as many questions as possible about the story. For example: Why would Rabbi Yanai's statement be enough to end young Yehuda's life?
-
Returning on Sabbath eve – see the preceding mishna, and the discussion of the mitzvah of Onah there.
-
Pillar of Fire – where do we know this pillar from? See Shemot 13:21-24, Bamidbar 14:14. What is the significance of this sign? See also Shemot 34:27-35.
-
Can you discern from R. Yanai's actions his ideology regarding the tension between home and the yeshiva? Compare his opinion about the Mitzva of Shmita, Bavli Sanhedrin 26a.
-
What is this story about in your opinion? Offer various readings.
On the same subject it is related: Rav Yosef, son of Rava, was sent by his father to the study hall to learn before the great Sage Rav Yosef. They agreed that he should sit for six years in the study hall. When three years had passed, the eve of Yom Kippur arrived and he said: I will go and see the members of my household, meaning his wife. His father heard and took a weapon, as if he were going to war, and went to meet him. According to one version he said to him: Did you remember your mistress, as you are abandoning your studies to see a woman? There are those who say that he said to him: Did you remember your dove? Since both father and son were involved in an argument, they were preoccupied and this Master did not eat the cessation meal before Yom Kippur and that Master also did not eat the cessation meal that day.
Neither one broke – they did not eat the meal of Yom Kippur after which you stop eating and the fast begins. The last meal on the eve of Tisha b'Av and Yom Kippur is called seudah mafseket – the breaking meal.
-
Why does young Rav Yosef want to go home?
-
Why is his father so adamant to prevent his son from coming home? What was he afraid of? How would you define his ideology on the tension between home and the yeshiva?
-
Each version of Rava's statement to his son adds a different flavor to the story. What differences do you hear between the two statements? See for example Song of Songs 2:14.
-
"Neither one nor the other broke" – some interpretations mean this to understand that neither of them managed to eat before the fact (seuda mafseket), others cherish the ambivalence. What do you understand from this image?
Compare all three stories:
-
-
What relationships are in the focus of each story?
-
Can you suggest a progression from the first to the last story?
-
What is the significance of time and space in each one of them? Where and when do they take place?
-